It's conversations like this surrounding Seider that make other fans despise this fanbase.
A rookie D on a mediocre and rebuilding team tied for 9th in PPP, 19th in shots, 25th in hits, 8th in blocked shots, and 14th in assists across all D.
The reason it was "always going to be Seider" is because he is already an elite D man.
On the flip side... a rookie D, playing on any established team, doesn't get the same opportunity to excel, that he did in Detroit.
If he's in Toronto, Tampa... or a whole bunch of other teams, he isn't on PP1 at all, if he's on the PP at all in his first season... he isn't on the first pairing.. on good teams, there just isn't that opportunity. So Seider, at say 30 points, on a good team... is he even in the discussion for the Calder?
Seider is going to be an Elite D in this league, and he's an amazing talent.... he came into a situation where his skill set was a need, and he took full advantage of it, earned his spot, excelled, and had a great year.
Similarly, Bunting came into a situation where his skill set was a need, he took full advantage of it, earned his spot, excelled, and had a great year.
I'm not trying to take anything away from Seider, just pointing out, all these guys came into situations where they could excel, and they did. Seider wouldn't have had the same opportunities on a top team....