Agreed I especially like his references to how we ran into dominant teams. Isn't that the point that we NEVER built that dominant team?
Really? Because the same exact teams that won two Stanley Cups got blown out in two other Finals appearances. Your logic is flawed.
Also, to further combat what you said, those Rangers team that lost to the dominant Bruins team, each loss in the series (save game six) were one goal games. They lost in six games.
The 79 team had no business getting that far begin with. Would have been the equivalent of the Kings being and 8th seed winning the Cup.
The Rangers never built a dominant team? LOL ok, what ever you want to believe.
Question, what did you think of the 1992 team? They lost to the Penguins. Could it be possible a dominant regular season team doesn't win the Cup? The '70s Rangers consisting of Gilbert, Ratelle, Tkaczuk, Hadfield, Giacomin, Villemure, Vickers, Park...they weren't good enough for you? How many hall of fame names are in that group?
Rangers had contending rosters in the '20s, '30s, '40s, '60s, '70s, '90s. And a Cup appearance in 1950.
Either some of you have an unrealistic opinion on success or your privileged. One or the other.