- Apr 17, 2017
- 23,501
- 18,838
Love PK Subban. Hate Messier. IMO Messier is no good and only got that job because of his great playing career and name. Commentators should get their jobs based on merit; not because of their name. PK is fantastic!
Now look at who those teams were and their relation to PK Subban and you’ll have your answerSubban is fantastic? I have a hard time listening to him because of how bad his insights almost always are. Just look at his first round predictions. How is it even possible to go 2-6? Toronto and Washington basically had a bye, and he somehow predicted both wrong
The bad part about the women thing is there are actually knowledgeable women with easy to listen to voices that don't get the push those two do. I mean Jen Botterill, Hillary Knight, AJ Melzco to name a few. Speaking of being in over ones head. Emily Caplan is a wonderful writer and seems very hockey knowledgeable, however he interview style which comes off as fake enthusiasm (or at least way over the top) is annoying as hell.PK is absolutely horrendous and if he does have a point, it’s lost in his fake banter or screaming. Agreed on meritocracy in broadcasting though. If we think hockey coaches are all retreads just look at these broadcasting booths.This also applies to the “pros” like Buccigross or Levy, that think the narrative is more interesting than the actual game. If there is any attrition, these networks inevitably shoehorn in as many women as humanly possible to replace them, competency be damned. I’ll gladly be labeled a misogynist if it means Cassie Campbell and Leah Hextall aren’t on the feed.
Now look at who those teams were and their relation to PK Subban and you’ll have your answer
Now look at who those teams were and their relation to PK Subban and you’ll have your answer