GDT: MDF #1 - 05/02/14 | New York Rangers @ Pittsburgh Penguins | 7:00 - NBC SPORTS, CBC

[Pavel Buchnevich]

So if thats called no goal on the ice, how do you find conclusive evidence that Lundqvist wasn't interfered with?

 

[SnowblindNYR]

Both goals because McDonagh ****s up and Lundqvist can't bail us out. I blame the both of them. Both were goals Hank should have had from McD's blown coverage

Shocking Hank can't bail them out.

 

[Ratelleitlikeitis]

I HATE these CBC commentators. They are sooo biased to Pens it's disgusting. It's an embarrassment. They are so awful.

Bob Cole is awful..oh baby

 

[FLNYR]

Well I really enjoyed the first period

 

[Thunderhead]

AV should just punch Pierre .

 

[Florida Ranger]

Both goals because McDonagh ****s up and Lundqvist can't bail us out. I blame the both of them. Both were goals Hank should have had from McD's blown coverage

Every goal is stoppable

Should really be 0-0. Actually, all of the games from opening night of the 05-06 season should be still should be going on.

 

[NYGBleedBlueNYR]

This is a joke

Entire period Rangers look worthless.

 

[nevesis]

Stepan is ALWAYS a second behind. Such a soft baby mind.

 

[haohmaru]

Hank being Hank? LOL.

 

[InwoodBlueNYC]

The pens have always beat us buy waiting for the trailing man from behind and scoring. Its mind boggling how they haven't figured that out yet.

Good call. You are right

 

[SRTtoZ]

Lol I love how we pass right to Pens players.

 

[KingP]

nice no look pass

 

[trilobyte]

The pens have always beat us buy waiting for the trailing man from behind and scoring. Its mind boggling how they haven't figured that out yet.

Yep, it's the play that always scares me. Quite often, it is Malkin simply hammering it so fast that nobody even has time to react.

 

[rdhstlr23]

We can blame whomever, but yoy can't go 0-23 on the PP and expect to win against teams more talented than you...at their house. Habs steal one against Boston bc of that. 2 shots in this perios...totally dominated.

 

[Pavel Buchnevich]

Why isn't goalie interference reviewable? I want one good reason

It was called no goal. Why would they even need to review that? Clearly no goal if he interferes with Hank.

 

[ajdj10]

ROFL at the people saying that's not a good goal. It absolutely is.

Didn't seem like it would've made a difference if Malkin didn't touch Hank.
I don't think Hank even knew where it was.

 

[nikonsniper*]

ROFL at the people saying that's not a good goal. It absolutely is.

good goal in terms of what is reviewable? yes. In terms of what is allowed in hockey? no.

You cant chop a goalies arm. Simple as that.

 

[Hunter Gathers]

Can't review goalie interference. There was no call on the ice where there should've been. This is why a case can be made for a coach's challenge flag or something of that ilk to review plays where calls should've been made. Terrible non call.

Yeah, I know you can't review it. I have no idea why it wasn't called that way on the ice. It is just home ****ing cooking. Such utter ********.

 

[vrgadin]

I have no ****ing clue how that wasn't goalie interference. None. Someone please tell me how that is possibly a good goal.

Cause the pens and crosby are the nhls golden child, and the refs keep them happy

 

[rholt168]

Regular season Hank saves that.

Regular season Rangers don't let the man walk down broadway untouched.

 

[Cobra Jack*]

Henrik Lundqvist is not a Stanley cup goaltender. It's becoming clear now. He just never makes the big save. NEVER.

 

[nevesis]

Shocking Hank can't bail them out.

He made the save on Neil.

 

[nevesis]

“@PLeonardNYDN: Rangers with three shots on goal this periodâ€

 

[NCRanger]

This all started because of an absolute crap call on St. Louis.

 

[haohmaru]

It was called no goal. Why would they even need to review that? Clearly no goal if he interferes with Hank.

Called no goal because they thought Malkin hit it with a high stick not because they thought he hit Lundqvist. Wrong on both (the refs).