McTavish awarded goal and given goalie interference penalty - correct call?

Stickpucker

Playmaka
Jan 18, 2014
16,447
40,009
When you see the replay it's clear it isn't GI.

When I saw it in real time I thought it was GI. So I get the refs making the mistake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pi314

LuGBuG

Quack Quack
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2006
4,905
3,587
Ducks
It’s the Ducks way. Even if we do finally score the other team gets a PP to tie it up as fast as possible.
 

HugeInTheShire

You may not like me but, I'm Huge in the Shire
Mar 8, 2021
4,474
5,939
Alberta
Good goal obviously, I can see why the ref thought it was GI in real time, but I don’t understand how they’d review and still come to that conclusion.
 

895

Registered User
Jun 15, 2007
8,690
7,954
Is it like a roughing call after a good goal or something? That’s the only way I can see it make sense and not having the GI cancel out the goal.

Yeah I see was pushed but in my opinion he could’ve tried harder to avoid launching himself into the goalie.

Anyway I still think it’s a bad call. No GI.
 

lardneau

Registered User
Oct 7, 2011
222
100
Technically the play’s dead once the puck crosses the goal line… so McTavish got a goaltender interference penalty during a stoppage of play?

To me looks like no call, but if had to call it something, perhaps roughing? Perplexing. That said, since the ref had the arm up for a penalty, don’t think there’s an option for reviewing a minor penalty in the rulebook. In other words, even if the ref wanted to “take back” the call when reviewing the goal, not sure the rulebook allows it
 

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2014
30,257
42,838
So the puck clearly goes in first and then someone crashes into the goaltender. Okay, if he went in on his own and hit the goalie right after, such a call could theoretically make sense and be right. But Provorov's dumb ass clearly shoves him right into his tendy.

This is a case where the War Room simply has to take control of the situation and take off the penalty.

I don't give a damn if the penalty call itself technically cannot be reviewed. Rules are skirted around frequently. They seem to pick and choose when to do that.

This league really knows how to infuriate you. Idk how the Ducks coach didn't absolutely lose his shit.

The league per usual won't properly explain this or review the protocol for such a future case and we'll be left wondering when the next time something like this happens in a big spot like a playoff game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zegs2sendhelp

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
43,387
40,526
Good goal obviously, I can see why the ref thought it was GI in real time, but I don’t understand how they’d review and still come to that conclusion.
So the puck clearly goes in first and then someone crashes into the goaltender. Okay, if he went in on his own and hit the goalie right after, such a call could theoretically make sense and be right. But Provorov's dumb ass clearly shoves him right into his tendy.

This is a case where the War Room simply has to take control of the situation and take off the penalty.

I don't give a damn if the penalty call itself technically cannot be reviewed. Rules are skirted around frequently. They seem to pick and choose when to do that.

This league really knows how to infuriate you. Idk how the Ducks coach didn't absolutely lose his shit.

The league per usual won't properly explain this or review the protocol for such a future case and we'll be left wondering when the next time something like this happens in a big spot like a playoff game.
Last time he lost his shit on a call I’m pretty sure they made it a 5 on 3 call…. So prob didn’t want to put his team down 5 on 3
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad