BBKers
Registered User
So this was “the future considerations” still lingering from the Jessiman Trade? I Take it and run. Btw. This trade was on My list a few weeks ago. My wish list.
If your definition of enforcer characterizes McLeod as one, but not McQuaid, I would get a new definition.McQuaid has one fight as a Ranger, and he lost![]()
Honestly, I think the leading candidate might be Cody McLeod.As much as I'd like to celebrate, I'm wondering who the Rangers may target this summer to replace him.
I'd bring up Lettieri or Fogarty probably. Although I would not be against Beleskey to see if he could build some value between now and the end of the year
As long as it's a one year, similar cap hit deal I'd endorse that over whatever else they may decide to do.Honestly, I think the leading candidate might be Cody McLeod.
McQuaid has one fight as a Ranger, and he lost![]()
McQuaid has one fight as a Ranger, and he lost![]()
ZucI remember people praised McLord, he created energy. Well so much for that, thanks for your services.
So who's our enforcer now?
Not sure whats more amazing to me...we actually got a 7th rounder for this slug...or this thread has actually reached 4 pages
Posted for the photo.
He has 2 fights. HE also pummeled the kid from Boston who hit Quickie.
And the fight he 'lost' was one where he fought the toughest guy in the NHL and they absolutely were very evenly matched. He's a tough hombre
Hey you never know. A 7th could always be a kid who might have been eligible for the following years draft as well and we buy low on him with the hope his stock will rise.I mean, we basically got nothing. It was as close to a formal 'borrowing' as you can get without being a conditional 7th.
A 7th is..whatever.