f*** there's a lot of nonsense in here, it's like hfboards is completely without the ability to offer nuanced takes. Perhaps it's because every thread title is "Was this the best/worst/most medium thing in the history of the planet?" which only leads to polarized takes.
This only accelerates with superstars (old timers will remember we had to quarantine a thread specifically about Ovie and Crosby for a couple of years because everything became this awful pissing contest). Haters will say dipshit stuff to be contrarian, and then defenders will overreact and become angry against any and every criticism and around and around we go.
If you have played the game, you have to understand there is some nuance here.
First, is McDavid the most culpable player here? Unequivocally no. He gives Barrie a nice easy pass with a lot of space and Barrie buries it into Smith's shin pads. Barrie is the high man, so he is the first man back but for some reason he is skating like an old man here. The Barrie I know is a good skater so I'm curious whether he was exhausted here. If so, that opens a litany of other questions like why is he so tired 30 seconds into a pp and if he is tired, why not play Bouchard there for a shift?
So some of those who are defending McDavid are rightfully saying, "Barrie set himself on fire and you're blaming McDavid for not commandeering a hose like that was the biggest problem".
Further, there is some truth to the idea that when there is an even man situation, on the backcheck, you take a look over your shoulder and try to pick up a trailer instead of overplaying the puck carrier.
However, The fact that they are on the PP means that you should outnumber your opponents wherever the puck is. In the offensive zone that means creating little 2 on 1s and 3 on 2s so that the puck carrier always has more options than the D can cover.
On the back check, particularly on a breakaway, it's just not really good enough to say, "Meh, they'll catch him". You have to understand, the great two way players put effort into situations that might only matter 2 out of 10 times. The fact that turned into a 2-on-0 and McDavid didn't backcheck is a terrible look, especially for a captain. Because you should be busting your ass in case there are 3 rebounds and you managed to get there before they tapped the 4th one in. People who are saying that McDavid is not showing Stanley cup levels of effort are entirely accurate. It's not acceptable and I wouldn't be happy to see a peewee kid lollygag back because they don't want to 'waste' effort in case the breakaway is a goal anyway.
So what does this mean?
Unfortunately for Oilers fans, I think it means that McDavid has lost belief in the team as it is currently constructed.
I'm not going to go all fatalistic and say he will demand a trade, etc. But when a leader stops showing that level of effort, when they are only working hard enough to be able to defensibly say "I had my man", it points to a bad culture.
We saw it with J.T. Miller last year. Our dressing room was broken, and he had a number of plays where if it wasn't high percentage, he would just quit. He didn't trust his teammates, he was resentful of the player who had made the mistake, etc. It's a bad look.
The Oilers dearly need to clean out their nepotistic front office and bring someone in with a clear and coherent vision that McDavid can see and get behind, because even a superstar can start to seem checked out.
So was McDavid even close to the most culpable player on this player? No.
Was it a bad look and a bad sign for his buy in to the franchise as it is currently constructed. It was, and if they don't act decisively, they are going to lose him emotionally.