Arthur Morgan
Registered User
so what maybe I over exaggerated the number abit. I think most would still go with the true winner over higher regular season point totals.This poll has been done before. It's not 90%
so what maybe I over exaggerated the number abit. I think most would still go with the true winner over higher regular season point totals.This poll has been done before. It's not 90%
Gretzky has the record at 13 straight 90pt seasons, but you can also change that to 13 straight 120pt seasons (12 straight 137pt or better seasons)
I dunno if everyone will get on board with McDavid joining the top 4 without one.
McDavid keeps up what hes doing and brings a cup home and I think there will be ALOT less people disagreeing he doesnt deserve it.
regular season just isnt enough he needs post season success. if he never wins he for sure will go down as the greatest player to never win anything.
Since breaking Gretzky’s points record is impossible he would easily be the greatest player of all time
Maybe to you.doesnt matter but winning a cup to become the 5th best player of all time does
It would be incredibly difficult, but most people felt the same way about his goal scoring record - - I would never say it’s “impossible” for McDavid to do.
Gretzky had a huge drop off in the second half of his career - - which was inevitable, given how spectacular his first half was.
After turning 30, he only scored 30+ goals twice and never reached 40. He also only reached 100+ points twice.
No question McDavid would have to play into his 40’s as he would need an extra five or six seasons beyond what Gretzky had.
120 points per season for the next ten years and it’ll be on.
McDavid after 623 games: 941 pointsIt would be incredibly difficult, but most people felt the same way about his goal scoring record - - I would never say it’s “impossible” for McDavid to do.
Gretzky had a huge drop off in the second half of his career - - which was inevitable, given how spectacular his first half was.
After turning 30, he only scored 30+ goals twice and never reached 40. He also only reached 100+ points twice.
No question McDavid would have to play into his 40’s as he would need an extra five or six seasons beyond what Gretzky had.
120 points per season for the next ten years and it’ll be on.
well thats the thing, there are others that think just like I do. and if everyone isnt on board with him being 5th overall. he will never be 5th overall. will just be someone's opinion compared to someone else's atleast one thing every list will have in common is 1-4 but after 5 most will be different and if most are different then how could he be 5th all time?Maybe to you.
And in the grand scheme of things, that means extremely little.
There's not a chance in hell that McDavid breaks Gretzky's point record or goal scoring record.
So far in his career, McDavid has 941 points in 623 games. Gretzky finished with 2857 points. He's not even a third of the way there and he's already 9 years into his NHL career. With goals, he's at 324 goals in 623 games while Gretzky finished with 894 goals. Again, about a third of the way there and he's already 9 years into his NHL career.
None at all. Nobody ever did. Mario Lemieux after 623 games: 1,279 points. And that’s the year his career ppg peaked….McDavid after 623 games: 941 points
Gretzky after 623 games: 1,493 points
He has zero chance
If McDavid gets to his age 35 season with no more work stoppages or other career disruption, performing at his most recent 3 seasons' pace, he would end that season somewhere around 2,050 and 2,100 points. While unlikely-nearing-impossible to catch Gretzky, he is solidly pacing to finish his career as an uncontested 2nd place in points in history. Using the same for goals, his stat line at 35 years old would be roughly:
716 goals (7th all time, 1 behind Esposito for 6th)
1,340 assists (2nd all time, nearly 100 more than Francis in 3rd)
2,056 points (2nd all time, more than 100 points ahead of 3rd)
767 goals (51 in even 2-3 seasons from 36-38 years old should be doable) would move him to top 3 all time in goals. For comparison, Crosby is at age 36, and is at 582g/1,562p - McDavid could easily be > 150G and 500p above Crosby... A year earlier. Crosby is a great player, but McDavid is clearly on the trajectory to be in the conversation of "Greatest players." It's not a knock on Crosby to suggest McDavid is near-certainly going to have a better career, the same it is not a knock on McDavid to say Gretzky is still in a class of his own at the top.
So while passing Gretzky is unlikely, are people seriously that petty about a team award like Cups won that they'd suggest a player top 3 all time in goals, and 2nd all time to ONLY Gretzky in assists and points isn't going to be a very serious and legitimate conversation about being in or replacing the "Big 4?"
Especially in light of this: (intentionally clipped down to Crosby, as this "Cups!" thing is the only argument left to make for Crosby over McDavid)
View attachment 826043
Zero chance for sure. I am also willing to bet McDavid's career will be shorter than #99's.McDavid after 623 games: 941 points
Gretzky after 623 games: 1,493 points
He has zero chance
There is absolutely nothing McDavid can do to surpass Gretzky. Come on now.
The interesting debate is whether he can push one of Lemieux, Orr or Howe to #5 and get into the top-4 himself. But Gretzky is going to be untouched as the GOAT in hockey.
Assuming that McDavid continues at a 150 point pace through his age 35 season is.....optimistic, to put it politely.
Also, the fact that McDavid is still 800 points behind Gretzky in this pie in the sky example for McDavid just shows how impossible it is for him to catch Gretzky.
To be fair, he did preface it by saying "hypothetical" lolAlways has to be a person or two who creates a distraction by bringing up absurd ideas like McDavid chasing down Gretzky’s points mark. Becoming the only other to hit 2000 is a reasonable goal and expectation to set, not 2858.
To provide further context:Assuming that McDavid continues at a 150 point pace through his age 35 season is.....optimistic, to put it politely.
Also, the fact that McDavid is still 800 points behind Gretzky in this pie in the sky example for McDavid just shows how impossible it is for him to catch Gretzky.
and 87% of percentages posted on messages boards are pulled from someone's ass.yet 90% of people would still take Crosby over McDavid
I've lost track trying to follow your logic.McDavid vs Sid Crosby isn’t even up for discussion. McDavid has long since proven he’s the superior player by a wide margin.
Hypothetical question: if McDavid breaks Gretzky’s point record and Ovechkin’s goal scoring record but DOES NOT win a championship, where does he rank?
Some people may have said the same thing about the goal scoring record but (1) it still isn't broken yet and (2) not many would have said that. The points record is so much further out of reach from the goal scoring record that you can't really compare the two.It would be incredibly difficult, but most people felt the same way about his goal scoring record - - I would never say it’s “impossible” for McDavid to do.
Gretzky had a huge drop off in the second half of his career - - which was inevitable, given how spectacular his first half was.
After turning 30, he only scored 30+ goals twice and never reached 40. He also only reached 100+ points twice.
No question McDavid would have to play into his 40’s as he would need an extra five or six seasons beyond what Gretzky had.
120 points per season for the next ten years and it’ll be on.
What???EDM fans have to understand he also may never become the 5th best player of all time. for everyone to get on the same page and agree he is like the top 4. he will need to win atleast one cup not even sure if 1 is enough either.
if everyone cant agree hes top 5 then hes not top 5. I dont think ive seen anyone or many argue top 4 is Gretzky, Orr, Lemieux and Howe. not always in that order but nontheless unlike McDavid everyone agree's they are top 4.
McDavid should find a home in the top 10 but to take that extra step he needs a cup and likely a conn smythe
okay but what about Cups or Conn Smythes?