sure, it's possible but where's the proof?
all the connected hockey guys (ie. hockey central) said it had nothing to do with luongo
cope not liking burke has nothing to do with meddling owners (what bobcat is accusing). i believe the whole board doesn't like burke
that, and his poor performance
but, of course, bobcat throws everyone in a frenzy saying owners wanted to have their fingers in the trade market
Cope is on the Board, is the CEO of Bell Canada. Bell partly owns MLSE. The MLSE in which Cope sits on the Board for, which made the decision to fire Burke.
If this was about poor performance, there are a few things that would have happened. He would have already have been fired. It wouldn't have taken August, September, October, November, December for them to figure out his poor performance should get him fired. Also, Bryan Colangelo. If it's about poor performance in any way shape or form, that guy is also out of a job right now. Alas, it's not.
Cope not liking Burke and getting rid of him for just that, has a lot to do with meddling owners. Again, if they came out and said his record, it would be a different story, but they didn't. The didn't get into specifics during the presser and umed and ahed their way through an interview with McCown. That to me says right there they had no actual really good reason to fire him, other than someone at the top just didn't like him, and convinced others on the Board to just not like him.
When it comes to Bob McCown's and Burke's relationship as well, they're friends outside of this realm we follow that is hockey and sports. McCown attacked MLSE, not for firing Burke, as he has said many times you could justify, but for the how and why, which is as thin and whispy as any wet piece of paper to try to write on.