Morozov
The Devil Killer
- Sep 18, 2007
- 13,846
- 364
So wait a second. You keep proclaiming that Floyd winning was never in question and never for second in any trouble, yet you also say that Floyd couldn't have ended it sooner? Maybe it's me, but it seems like you're talking out of both sides of your mouth here. If he was never in jeopardy and the outcome was never in doubt, why wouldn't he have poured it on earlier than he did? Oh yeah, that's right. Because he's a risk adverse little kittykat that even when facing a guy with no chance to do anything against him, plays it safe to a ridiculous level. That's exactly why the guy is a sham.
Again, and I don't understand why this needs to be explained to someone who claims to follow Boxing so many times, as you take more risks offensively, you open up more opportunities for your opponent. Why present your opponent opportunities that you don't need to? What does Mayweather have to gain by doing this? you can never answer this, you just run and hide from it over and over and over again. Fact is he has no reason to, it isn't the smart play, it's just you want a reason to criticise the man and moan because you don't like his style. But his style undeniably works, so your opinion of it means nothing.
Again, but you won't answer because you never do. Why does it make any sense for Floyd to push the issue sooner than he is ready? I've asked you this what must be a dozen times, you can never provide an answer.
Again, how many KO's for Floyd in the last decade?
How many KOs for Floyd in his last ten fights?
Floyd tried to bet on himself to KO in under 9.5 rounds, so evidently the fight went (a little) longer than he was expecting.. But here's LSCII the expert who knows better than the man himself
Last edited: