And why have they been an exception? These are imperfect teams prone to mistakes which lead to offense which leads to more goals. The size of ice has no role here. It's the same at the World Juniors, always entertaining hockey on any ice surface! Why? Imperfect players prone to mistakes leading to offense, leading to more goals. Take all the best players in today's game with superior coaching and adequate preparation, we'll get the Sochi Olympics. A complete bore snooze fest. and I imagine the pending World Cup will be much of the same. The size of the ice has nothing to do with it. The way to solve goal scoring in the NHL? Expand by 12 teams, incorporate 12 AHL teams in the NHL and Voila... McDavid breaks Gretzky's single season scoring record. And I lived in Europe for 7 years attending a lot of hockey, domestic leagues and WHC. If the NHL ever goes to an Olympic size ice surface, then it better be after I'm long gone and pushing up daises. Big ice = boring. I'm not sure about you, but I found that the Tampa v Montreal game had a whole lot more entertainment value than the Canada v Sweden game. And I am neither a Habs fan or Bolts fan. The 6-4 result in the Canada v Sweden game was due to atrocious goaltending. That was some gawdawful goaltending. I don't know how that level of goaltending makes the game more appealing. Good grief.