1909
Registered User
- Jul 6, 2016
- 20,752
- 11,358
Maybe but Galchenyuk was never given a real chance here though!!!
And he was a centerman, most obviously....
Maybe but Galchenyuk was never given a real chance here though!!!
I'm not looking at KK's point production. I'm looking at his play. My guts tell me Domi will be the #1 center for this team. KK does not have the skills to be a #1. I know I'm probably in the minority of one when it comes to that opinion but Kotkaniemi does not strike me as a #1 center...ever. Domi is a superior skater, has better stick handling skills and I would say his vision and hockey IQ is better. Also, Domi's shot is more accurate but not as powerful.What? Lol.
You think Domi would be on pace for a 40 point season when he was 18 years old? Or you think progression is not in the future for Kotkaniemi since he's already in the NHL?
I have a feeling that when it's all set and done, Domi will be a PPG play making right winger with Kotkaniemi.
I'm not looking at KK's point production. I'm looking at his play. My guts tell me Domi will be the #1 center for this team. KK does not have the skills to be a #1. I know I'm probably in the minority of one when it comes to that opinion but Kotkaniemi does not strike me as a #1 center...ever. Domi is a superior skater, has better stick handling skills and I would say his vision and hockey IQ is better. Also, Domi's shot is more accurate but not as powerful.
I'm not looking at KK's point production. I'm looking at his play. My guts tell me Domi will be the #1 center for this team. KK does not have the skills to be a #1. I know I'm probably in the minority of one when it comes to that opinion but Kotkaniemi does not strike me as a #1 center...ever. Domi is a superior skater, has better stick handling skills and I would say his vision and hockey IQ is better. Also, Domi's shot is more accurate but not as powerful.
I've seen other 18 year-olds come and impress and then stay at that level: Mario Tremblay, Weickenhesier, Galchenyuk and that's just on the Habs. KK does not have elite vision. He has good vision. His shot is not elite, it's decent when he gets it on target. His skating is mediocre and he needs to resolve his balance issues. Don't get me wrong. He'll be a very good #2. But I don't buy the hype being peddled about this kid. Especially on this bi-polar forum. I can see in three, four years many fans turning on him because he didn't grow into what they were hoping for.I’m not sure how anyone can see KK as the youngest person in the NHL and not think he’s a future all star center. He has elite vision, shot, sense and passing skills. Not to mention he’s a black hole in the defensive zone for the other teams offence.
Don’t know what else you’d want for a 18 year old who as many points in the NHL as he did in the Finnish league last year.
He will be a future no. 1 center.
Wow, just, wow.I'm not looking at KK's point production. I'm looking at his play. My guts tell me Domi will be the #1 center for this team. KK does not have the skills to be a #1. I know I'm probably in the minority of one when it comes to that opinion but Kotkaniemi does not strike me as a #1 center...ever. Domi is a superior skater, has better stick handling skills and I would say his vision and hockey IQ is better. Also, Domi's shot is more accurate but not as powerful.
If Poehling beats out Danault, that could suggest that he would be worthy of the 2C spot. A guy like Domi could be just as effective on the wing. If Poehling is better than Danault and ends up being to good to play 3C then something would have to give. Kotkaniemi takes the #1 spot, now we have Domi and Poehling for the #2 spot, you cannot put Poehling at the wing, he’s a natural centerman, no NHL team would do that as a full time plan. Domi on the other hand can easily slide onto the wing and be just as effective or even more effective offensively. It’s a great problem to have if we ever get there. So Kotkaniemi-Domi or Kotkaniemi-Poehling, either way we’re in business if Poehling pans out. As long as Danault finds his way naturally down to the 3C we will be fine. Or if Poehling ends up being our 3C we should be fine as well. Either way, we are looking pretty good at center for the future.What's the problem with running 4 good centers? Move him to wing or trade him then if Poehling if makes him expendable. Not a big deal.
Kotkaniemi and Domi give us two good offensive centers in the top-6 for the first time in 20 years and people can't wait to change that to... accommodate Danault lol?
Stamkos-Point, Kuzya-Backstrom, Matthews-Tavares, this is what your competition is icing. Danault sure as hell shouldn't be the threshold for the 2C spot. If Poehling can't beat out Domi than our third line will be that much stronger with him.
Max is amazing, grit skills heart, everything you look for in a player!! I remember all the comments of the HF drama queens after the sucker punch on Ekblad!!
Its just too bad we had to give up Chucky to get him, I was watching him yesterday in Zona and he would help the PP tremendously and even 5 on 5, having a shooter would do wonders to that passing first forward group!!!
I've seen other 18 year-olds come and impress and then stay at that level: Mario Tremblay, Weickenhesier, Galchenyuk and that's just on the Habs. KK does not have elite vision. He has good vision. His shot is not elite, it's decent when he gets it on target. His skating is mediocre and he needs to resolve his balance issues. Don't get me wrong. He'll be a very good #2. But I don't buy the hype being peddled about this kid. Especially on this bi-polar forum. I can see in three, four years many fans turning on him because he didn't grow into what they were hoping for.
You can put him in the 2C spot even if he doesn't surpass Domi, you're just gonna come up short against the top teams' best centers.If Poehling beats out Danault, that could suggest that he would be worthy of the 2C spot.
As a poster who has frequently commented on the team’s ‘success’ this year being a function of the noticeable upgrade in the team’s increased level of speed, I would only comment that having elite speed is not a prerequisite for a player being considered a #1 center. There are ample examples of players who are not seen as speed merchants (Barkov) who achieve this designation due to a combination of factors: strong skating, ice presence and vision, high skills; size and elite compete and leadership attributes. In Kotkaniemi’s case he has, at the age of 18, already exhibited that he possesses some of these traits including a superior vision of the ice that allows him to often pass to areas of the ice where a teammate is going to be rather than trying to pass directly to a player . This anticipation, or vision, for such a young player, bodes well in attempting to project what type of a player he will develop into. Perhaps over the next few years as he matures physically, Kotkaniemi will gain a half or even a full step in his speed making him an even more imposing player. If not, he will still be a core player on this team but will always be viewed as the player taken when the team had an opportunity to select a more impactive player.I'm not looking at KK's point production. I'm looking at his play. My guts tell me Domi will be the #1 center for this team. KK does not have the skills to be a #1. I know I'm probably in the minority of one when it comes to that opinion but Kotkaniemi does not strike me as a #1 center...ever. Domi is a superior skater, has better stick handling skills and I would say his vision and hockey IQ is better. Also, Domi's shot is more accurate but not as powerful.
You may have misunderstood me. I'm not saying he's not going to make the NHL. From what I've seen, I think he'll level off as a #2 center man especially if Domi is still on this team. I agree with you he'll be a core player. I just don't see this super stud #1 center man that many of the younger posters are raving about.As a poster who has frequently commented on the team’s ‘success’ this year being a function of the noticeable upgrade in the team’s increased level of speed, I would only comment that having elite speed is not a prerequisite for a player being considered a #1 center. There are ample examples of players who are not seen as speed merchants (Barkov) who achieve this designation due to a combination of factors: strong skating, ice presence and vision, high skills; size and elite compete and leadership attributes. In Kotkaniemi’s case he has, at the age of 18, already exhibited that he possesses some of these traits including a superior vision of the ice that allows him to often pass to areas of the ice where a teammate is going to be rather than trying to pass directly to a player . This anticipation, or vision, for such a young player, bodes well in attempting to project what type of a player he will develop into. Perhaps over the next few years as he matures physically, Kotkaniemi will gain a half or even a full step in his speed making him an even more imposing player. If not, he will still be a core player on this team but will always be viewed as the player taken when the team had an opportunity to select a more impactive player.
I've seen other 18 year-olds come and impress and then stay at that level: Mario Tremblay, Weickenhesier, Galchenyuk and that's just on the Habs. KK does not have elite vision. He has good vision. His shot is not elite, it's decent when he gets it on target. His skating is mediocre and he needs to resolve his balance issues. Don't get me wrong. He'll be a very good #2. But I don't buy the hype being peddled about this kid. Especially on this bi-polar forum. I can see in three, four years many fans turning on him because he didn't grow into what they were hoping for.
You can put him in the 2C spot even if he doesn't surpass Domi, you're just gonna come up short against the top teams' best centers.
I've seen other 18 year-olds come and impress and then stay at that level: Mario Tremblay, Weickenhesier, Galchenyuk and that's just on the Habs. KK does not have elite vision. He has good vision. His shot is not elite, it's decent when he gets it on target. His skating is mediocre and he needs to resolve his balance issues. Don't get me wrong. He'll be a very good #2. But I don't buy the hype being peddled about this kid. Especially on this bi-polar forum. I can see in three, four years many fans turning on him because he didn't grow into what they were hoping for.
I beg to differ. I saw Tremblay at 18, I've seen Doug at 18, and they never, ever exhibited thiks kids'talent and saavy. Never seen an 18 year old display his talents with the Habs ever in my existence. I believe he will be an impactful 1st line center a la Bobby Smith. I'm 52.I've seen other 18 year-olds come and impress and then stay at that level: Mario Tremblay, Weickenhesier, Galchenyuk and that's just on the Habs. KK does not have elite vision. He has good vision. His shot is not elite, it's decent when he gets it on target. His skating is mediocre and he needs to resolve his balance issues. Don't get me wrong. He'll be a very good #2. But I don't buy the hype being peddled about this kid. Especially on this bi-polar forum. I can see in three, four years many fans turning on him because he didn't grow into what they were hoping for.
I'm not looking at KK's point production. I'm looking at his play. My guts tell me Domi will be the #1 center for this team. KK does not have the skills to be a #1. I know I'm probably in the minority of one when it comes to that opinion but Kotkaniemi does not strike me as a #1 center...ever. Domi is a superior skater, has better stick handling skills and I would say his vision and hockey IQ is better. Also, Domi's shot is more accurate but not as powerful.
The only thing that makes me curious about Domi is why everyone wants him back at wing in 2/3 years...he’s really good where he is..why change?
Domi has 1 more year, How much of a raise is Domi getting? Considering we gave Drouin 5.5m$ and Galchenyuk 4.9M$...
Domi is having far more than a 60 point season. He's already at 59 with 18 games left. He's going to hit between 70 and 80 points.Depends what he does next year. If he has a similar 60 point season, i'd guess we'd probably be looking at something around 7-8m.