Post-Game Talk: Matthew Knies sons the Bruins - Leafs win 6-4

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Yikes. Those tweets are embarrassing.

According to HF policy, you need to attack the opinion and not the poster.

Why not quickly summarize what Han did wrong and the data that you have that tells a different story?

Han has provided alot of evidence to support hia argument and also used to be a player and worked for Leafs organization under Lou...he seems to have alot of credibility.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: al secord
Out of curiosity, when have the Leafs blown it in the third period this season?
History son. Look I get it happens to every team, we just happened to do it in such brutal ways. Difference between a SC contender and a pretender is stepping on teams throats when we are winning. They are better this year but do I trust this team, until they prove it in the playoffs I’ll keep my cynicism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HolyCrap
History son. Look I get it happens to every team, we just happened to do it in such brutal ways. Difference between a SC contender and a pretender is stepping on teams throats when we are winning. They are better this year but do I trust this team, until they prove it in the playoffs I’ll keep my cynicism.
Yawn. If the past dictated the future, there woud be no point in playing. If people still can't see the difference in this team under Treliving/Berube versus Dubas/Keefe, I don't know what to tell you.
 
According to HF policy, you need to attack the opinion and not the poster.
Lol what? Where did I attack anybody? I literally just laughed at a Jack Han tweet. AFAIK, Jack Han isn't even a poster here. Though looking at those tweets and the lazy with/without analysis without context, picking out random microstats in tiny samples, random leaps to broad conclusions, attempts to discredit points, etc. in them, he'd fit right in.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad