Value of: Matt Murray

USE Fi

Registered User
Sep 20, 2007
614
58
Home
San Jose traded a first-round pick in the 2016 NHL Draft and forward prospect Sean Kuraly to get Martin Jones. Something similar to this.
 

Ducks in a row

Go Ducks Quack Quack
Dec 17, 2013
18,068
4,447
U.S.A.
Stanley Cup winning goalie on ELC still Penguins would be idiots to keep MAF instead of him. His value would be high if he was for trade.
 

BHD

Here comes Skinner
Dec 27, 2009
38,448
16,920
Moncton, NB
San Jose traded a first-round pick in the 2016 NHL Draft and forward prospect Sean Kuraly to get Martin Jones. Something similar to this.

Jones hadn't backstopped a team to a Stanley Cup. Given what he's accomplished AND the Pens' situation (win now), he would probably cost more.
 
Last edited:

Hale The Villain

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2008
26,730
15,262
Stanley Cup winning goalie on ELC still Penguins would be idiots to keep MAF instead of him. His value would be high if he was for trade.

They might not have a choice. Fleury has a NMC and must be protected in expansion. He also has a NTC that allows him to dictate 18 teams he can be traded to, which doesn't look good for the Pens if Fleury decides he wants to stay in Pittsburgh. Given that there are only a handful of teams that need a starting goalie and don't already have a goalie signed for big money, all Fleury would have to do is name the 12 teams most likely to trade for him and the Pens will be screwed.

Well I shouldn't say the Pens will be screwed. Fleury is only 31 and is an above-average starter. Plus they have two promising young goalies in Jarry and Gustavsson in the organization. Even if they do end up trading Murray, the Pens have a solid future in goal.
 

BHD

Here comes Skinner
Dec 27, 2009
38,448
16,920
Moncton, NB
They might not have a choice. Fleury has a NMC and must be protected in expansion. He also has a NTC that allows him to dictate 18 teams he can be traded to, which doesn't look good for the Pens if Fleury decides he wants to stay in Pittsburgh. Given that there are only a handful of teams that need a starting goalie and don't already have a goalie signed for big money, all Fleury would have to do is name the 12 teams most likely to trade for him and the Pens will be screwed.

This is all speculation right now.
 

gwh

Registered User
Mar 4, 2013
3,688
622
Late first and overager NCAA prospect was the price for Jones.

Kuraly was a 5th rounder with 0.6 points per game in NCAA. Worth maybe a 3rd or 4th in vacuum.

So 20th + 4th round pick for Murray.
 

Honour Over Glory

Blomqvist for Vezina + ROTY
Jan 30, 2012
81,237
45,699
San Jose traded a first-round pick in the 2016 NHL Draft and forward prospect Sean Kuraly to get Martin Jones. Something similar to this.

Martin Jones didn't accomplish any of the stuff Matt Murray has so it's a start, but you'd have to add more, to get a Cup Winning goalie that isn't some fluke.
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
Jones hadn't backstopped a team to a Stanley Cup. Given what he's accomplished AND the Pens' situation (win now), he would probably cost more.

there also wasnt an impending expansion draft where every team could only protect 1 goalie, so that should lower the value.
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
If fleury decides he wants to remain a pen, they will have to take the best offer they can get, which wont be a mid 1st + top prospect
 

Honour Over Glory

Blomqvist for Vezina + ROTY
Jan 30, 2012
81,237
45,699
Late first and overager NCAA prospect was the price for Jones.

Kuraly was a 5th rounder with 0.6 points per game in NCAA. Worth maybe a 3rd or 4th in vacuum.

So 20th + 4th round pick for Murray.

This is the worst analyzing of value I have seen in this thread.

You are wrong.
 

BHD

Here comes Skinner
Dec 27, 2009
38,448
16,920
Moncton, NB
between his age inconsistent play and fairly large contract they could very well have a hard time finding a new home for fleury.

There is this scenario...

Fleury's contract carries a no-movement clause, according to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, meaning Rutherford would be compelled to protect him unless Fleury agrees to waive the clause so he can be left exposed in the expansion draft.

there also wasnt an impending expansion draft where every team could only protect 1 goalie, so that should lower the value.

That would be if they couldn't, in fact, move Fleury.

If fleury decides he wants to remain a pen, they will have to take the best offer they can get, which wont be a mid 1st + top prospect

If Fleury decides.
 
Last edited:

Hale The Villain

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2008
26,730
15,262
If fleury decides he wants to remain a pen, they will have to take the best offer they can get, which wont be a mid 1st + top prospect

I don't know about that. We're talking about a 22 year old starting goaltender that has already backstopped his team to a cup. And it's not like he's only had one good season, kid has been putting up ridiculous numbers at every level for 3 straight seasons now.

Even with expansion greatly limiting the number of potential trading partners, I think Murray could return at least a mid-1st and a quality prospect, if not more.
 

WayneSid9987

Registered User
Nov 24, 2009
30,055
5,678
Pretty sure MM won't be traded just because of an impending expansion.

Their last resort would be to bribe LV to not touch MM(thus still having the option to trade MAF or MM past exp.) or to buyout MAF(incures a 1.9M caphit for 4 seasons).

Pens are gonna dictate the situation on their terms, not panic because of expansion.

Seems like a pretty unlikely scenario given that Fleury has recently said he wants to remain a Penguin.

All he has to do is not waive his NMC and he's the starting goalie for the Pens again. If I were in his shoes that's what I'd do.

You're right. I highly doubt he'd waive for the exp. draft but that doesn't mean he's the starting goalie for the Pens.
Other things can be done.
 

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
40,046
14,727
Jones hadn't backstopped a team to a Stanley Cup. Given what he's accomplished AND the Pens' situation (win now), he would probably cost more.

Martin Jones didn't accomplish any of the stuff Matt Murray has so it's a start, but you'd have to add more, to get a Cup Winning goalie that isn't some fluke.

You guys are WAY overrating Murray here, I think.

You're attributing the Pens generally outplaying the Sharks to Murray, and attributing the Sharks playing a poor game/being outplayed to Jones. It's simply not accurate at all. The Pens were a far better team in the finals. That's for sure. Murray was fantastic when he needed to be, but he simply wasn't all that tested in the Sharks series. No doubt he deserved to start, he was really good. Jones was really good too throughout most of the year and the playoffs. He looks like Price-lite sometimes. Jones was a big reason the Sharks weren't swept.

So suggesting that Jones is inferior because he hasn't won the cup (as a starter) is just plain silly.
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
There is this scenario...





That would be if they couldn't, in fact, move Fleury.



If Fleury decides.

you think fleury would want to go to an expansion team, knowing full well they would likely try to move him at some point as he gets older?

surely that wasnt what he had in mind when he got a full NMC
 

airbus220

Registered User
Feb 19, 2012
3,872
56
PIT will keep Murray. They can buy out Fleury and that's also Fleury's trade value if he would waive his NMC for a trade, no value. Other teams won't pay much for Fleury. There will be many UFA goalies available in July.
PIT might trade Fleury for nothing to save the buy out cap hit if Fleury waives his NMC, otherwise he will be bought out.
The funny thing is, if Fleury would waive his NMC for the expansion draft he even might not be drafted. But if PIT asks Vegas to exempt Murray from the draft it will be expensive :)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad