Icicle
Think big
- Oct 16, 2005
- 6,055
- 1,007
1 for 1
Thoughts?
Let me get this straight.
You want a expansion-exempt 21-year-old fairly-established top-4 two-way RHD who plays an effective shot-suppression game for a 33 year-old non-exempt LW making $6M/per that doesn't play top-line minutes?
No. No. Nope. Not interested.
Let me get this straight.
You want a expansion-exempt 21-year-old fairly-established top-4 two-way RHD who plays an effective shot-suppression game for a 33 year-old non-exempt LW making $6M/per that doesn't play top-line minutes?
No. No. Nope. Not interested.
1 for 1
Thoughts?
Let me get this straight.
You want a expansion-exempt 21-year-old fairly-established top-4 two-way RHD who plays an effective shot-suppression game for a 33 year-old non-exempt LW making $6M/per that doesn't play top-line minutes?
No. No. Nope. Not interested.
Thoughts? You should have "thought" about this proposal before posting it.
Though I think your point is generally right, Moulson is $5M/per, FWIW. I was also going to correct you on the age, but apparently he just turned 33 yesterday... So he's a young-33 ...
Add reinhart and Canes listen..
Reinhart is far too much and the Canes aren't going to dismantle their current (and future) Defensive core for futures.
Add reinhart and Canes listen..
Unsurprising. Google is wrong...it says he makes $6M, every single cap-site says $5M AAV.
1 for 1
Thoughts?
I'm guessing (or hope) you mean something along the lines of what was posted earlier by Aho Mitakuye Oyasin?
Yes, Canes would obviously desire Reinhart, but it would cost more than Pesce and more than the Canes would want to give up.