Yeah of course... but that shouldn’t be used as a reason to justify paying him more money than he’s worth. Should all athletes be paid more in case they make bad financial decisions in the future?
Of course Martin wants as much as he can make, but the point up for debate is whether the Isles should pay him that.
What is the debate exactly?
The Isles can bury $1.125, $1.125 and $1.15 million in the AHL over the final three years of the deal, so it is clearly not a cap issue.
Martin took a salary cut to remain with the Isles and he was worth every penny last season.
On his current salary, so far we don't have any reason not to suspect he will live up to the salary at least this season and then it will depend on health. If he wears down significantly, he maybe goes to LTIR and then the salary is irrelevant.
Even middling-to-bad NHL/AHL vet types, like Kenny Agostino (most people will probably ask, who?), make in the $700,000-$750,000 range each season to help lead AHL teams.
If the worst comes to pass, Martin becomes an AHL player/coach and surely that has to be worth the insignificant NHL cap hit and minor premium he will earn the last year or so?
I just don't see what is up for debate. The Isles owners appear to want to keep him in the fold for life, be it as a player/coach or maybe for PR down the line, and it is their money to spend.