Frankenrogers
Registered User
Define 'next best.' The last two teams before the finals lose at the same stage of the playoffs.
No not playoffs, regular season. For this format three from each league are getting in (four for the league with the host team). If we take the 2013 WHL for example, the Top 6 regular season finishers in order were:
Portland
Edmonton
Kelowna
Kamloops
Calgary
Saskatoon
Based on the criteria for the 10 team finals, in the WHL we have:
Regular Season Winner: Portland
WHL Playoff Champion: Portland
WHL Playoff Runner Up: Edmonton
Host Team: Saskatoon
As host, Saskatoon was getting in regardless of where they placed this year in regular season or playoffs.
Portland by virtue of winning the regular season gets in.
That leaves the playoff winner (Portland) and runner up (Edmonton). Portland was already in by virtue of being first so that leaves one open spot as a wild card of sorts.
Going down the Top 6, we can bypass Edmonton (as they were playoff runner up) and we then get 3rd place finisher Kelowna as the wild card. While this scenario makes it easy with the top three regular season getting in, that wouldn't always necessarily be the case.
If Calgary had defeated Edmonton in the conference final, then Calgary is in as runner up and so going down the list would give us Edmonton as the wild card.
If, as host, Saskatoon had come in first overall, or as a finalist, then we would go down the regular season list as well.
If the final had been Kamloops and Calgary then, even at 2nd place in the regular season, Edmonton would be outside looking in.
It leaves room for some intrigue while rewarding those who saw success in the regular season and playoffs. The Host still gets in but at 10 teams, they still better be good to advance.
Anyway, not to hijack the thread, but the more that I think about this, the more that I like the 10 team Cup Final.