Dude just looked engaged for the full game for the first time this season. Good for him, let it roll
Yeah. What I liked was, he was really making plays and winning battles. Seemed a very sustainable game, and I think that Jones and Leason, while not being the best offensive players, meshed well with the style.Thought it was his best game last night. Is still producing this season despite limited mins and playing with 4th liners. Really good sign, and see the potential with this kid.
Miles better. You can see flashes of an impact player in there. I like him with Jones, too.Has looked better every game at C
Our players are being built as winners. They not only have to fight opponents on the ice, they also fight their own coaching staff decisions.Hilarious he was just finding his rhythm and Eakins moves him back to wing. Not even surprising.
Gm | Line | LW | C | RW | TOI | PP TOI | G | A | Pts | +/- | Shots | FOW | FOL | FO % | CF % | ||
10 | 4th | Leason | McTavish | Jones | 6:31 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 50.0 | ||
11 | 4th | Jones | McTavish | Leason | 9:41 | 0:55 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 72.2 | ||
12 | 4th | Jones | McTavish | Leason | 11:31 | 0:00 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% | 50.0 | ||
13 | 3rd | McTavish | Lundy | Silf | 10:47 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% | 27.3 | ||
14 | 2nd | McTavish | Strome | Vatrano | 14:40 | 4:11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0 |
I have to think Verbeek has his eye on Eakins' decisions. The mandate was pretty clear that he wants growth and progression from the kids. Questionable treatment of McTavish won't reflect too well on Eakins.the coaching staff moving MacT back to wing after a relatively successful stint at his natural position is the single weirdest thing i can think of in a while. They finally made what really appeared to be the right decision and then reversed course. is it really just to get gawdin in the lineup? their priorities just seem to be warped sometimes. this wouldn't even be up for discussion if we had Gallant behind the bench of something.
Well if they fire Eakins he can go back to being David Tennant's stunt double on Doctor Who because David Tennant is playing Dr. Who again in the new season.I have to think Verbeek has his eye on Eakins' decisions. The mandate was pretty clear that he wants growth and progression from the kids. Questionable treatment of McTavish won't reflect too well on Eakins.
I have to think Verbeek has his eye on Eakins' decisions. The mandate was pretty clear that he wants growth and progression from the kids. Questionable treatment of McTavish won't reflect too well on Eakins.