Toggle sidebar

Value of: Mason McTavish to Chicago

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Zegs2sendhelp said:
Chi don’t have the right pieces to make a mctavish trade appealing.

He’s looking good, biggest issue with him right now is consistency…. He’s shown this year that he is kinda a leader amongst the young players…. And is playing pretty good… still hope his points take a step forward but can say that about a lot of duck players
Click to expand...
Chicago is one of the only teams that do have the right pieces. The issue is Anaheim simply won't move him. They would probably debate it though if Chicago offered up this year's 1st (Misa looks that good)
 
Ledge And Dairy said:
Chicago is one of the only teams that do have the right pieces. The issue is Anaheim simply won't move him. They would probably debate it though if Chicago offered up this year's 1st (Misa looks that good)
Click to expand...
As far as pieces the hawks have young propsects and picks. Don’t think Anaheim needs more young prospects or picks
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bye Bye Blueston
Ledge And Dairy said:
Chicago is one of the only teams that do have the right pieces. The issue is Anaheim simply won't move him. They would probably debate it though if Chicago offered up this year's 1st (Misa looks that good)
Click to expand...
Sorry i should say "realistic" right pieces.

I dont imagine you are realistically trading Bedard or your 1st rounder this year.

Outside of that idk that much would be that appealing for us.... and even the 1st... idk how likely we are to want more prospects/picks.
 
Ledge And Dairy said:
Chicago is one of the only teams that do have the right pieces. The issue is Anaheim simply won't move him. They would probably debate it though if Chicago offered up this year's 1st (Misa looks that good)
Click to expand...
Like what? If the Ducks are moving McTavish it is for immediate forward help, not picks and prospects. Both teams are rebuilding, but the Ducks are trying to exit their rebuild and be in the playoff conversation next season. Does trading McTavish for picks/prospects make any sense for the Ducks?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rec T and Bye Bye Blueston
Zegs2sendhelp said:
pV said he prefers bridge deals off rookie contract….

But ya an offer sheet would need to be kinda rediculous for Anaheim not to match with our cap space.


Not even sure what kinda of offer we wouldn’t match, curious what Montreal would even offer … tho I guess the threat of offer sheet maybe forces trade talk /shrug
Click to expand...
Yeah obviously not a cap space thing more that philosophy Verbeek and he's clearly not adverse to grinding out negotiations.

I'd be fine giving up 1st, 2nd, 3rd compensation so I guess something like 7x8 and hoping they balk at it. If it would take going into the next tier of compensation to get them to walk away I'd be out
 
Ducks need Mctavish to maintain their strength and depth at centre and he's been good this year.

Chicago has nothing interesting to provide that'd replace him in any way. Doubt he'd be on the move anytime soon but i'm sure if we did move Mctavish it'd only be in a trade for a better player (probably a forward).
 
McTavish is on his way to becoming a perennial 30-30 2C who plays the game hard and has a good compete level. Once you've got one of those you keep him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom