Proposal: Marner for Swayman +

SensontheRush

Never said it was Sunshine
Apr 27, 2010
4,891
2,839
Ottawa
Bruins are not adding to Swayman for Marner lol.
Well, you do have to even out salaries.

I feel like Poitras is too much an add from the Bruins side, but if this were to go down, Swayman is not enough to nab Marner IMO, especially given the impass the Bruins are facing.

I was initially doing Swayman + Frederic + ?.
 

Ledge And Dairy

Registered User
Well, you do have to even out salaries.

I feel like Poitras is too much an add from the Bruins side, but if this were to go down, Swayman is not enough to nab Marner IMO, especially given the impass the Bruins are facing.

I was initially doing Swayman + Frederic + ?.
Poitras being too much to add is putting it lightly. Boston has adds because of cap reasons but Toronto isn't getting the pending UFA here. So Toronto should be the team adding futures
 
  • Like
Reactions: SensontheRush

SensontheRush

Never said it was Sunshine
Apr 27, 2010
4,891
2,839
Ottawa
There's also the fact that 1RW is likely the position that the Bruins need the least, haha.
I think we are talking skilled enough players that handedness wouldn't really get in the way of stacking a 1st with Marner and Pasta. Nor is attempting to build two 1st lines problematic IMO.
 

ChaoticOrange

Registered User
Jun 29, 2008
51,481
31,255
Edmonton
I think we are talking skilled enough players that handedness wouldn't really get in the way of stacking a 1st with Marner and Pasta. Nor is attempting to build two 1st lines problematic IMO.
In itself it isn't, but when you look at their goalie situation without Swayman, virtually no amount of scoring will help.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad