Any chance Ovy or Amirov join the Marlies any time soon?
I like Bunting-Matthews-MarnerRobertson is at 7 pt in 7 gp, wouldn't be mad to give him an opportunity in the top 6 for a bit to see what we have there.
i think kerfoot is miscast as a winger on that line personallyI like Bunting-Matthews-Marner
Kerfoot-Tavares-Nylander as our top 6 for now. Would rather leave Robertson in the A to build momentum and develop.
I'd agree. Definitely a spot that needs an upgrade.i think kerfoot is miscast as a winger on that line personally
I like Bunting-Matthews-Marner
Kerfoot-Tavares-Nylander as our top 6 for now. Would rather leave Robertson in the A to build momentum and develop.
i think kerfoot is miscast as a winger on that line personally
man i cant wait for knies to be ready, he seems perfect for that spot, but ye we need to find another solution, since taking kerfoot off an effective 3rd line makes it even worse imo.That 2nd line has been pretty ineffective at 5v5 for weeks now.
88 broke out a bit against the Blues but man I really think it was more individual effort/talent on 88's part than anything the line did.
We need to invest time in our own. Hoglander is over 100GP as a 2nd rounder in the same draft, Kaliyev 50GP and Leason at 35GP.
No issue in giving him a spin.
Those 2 players also play on considerably worse teams, and are not exactly ripping it up either.That 2nd line has been pretty ineffective at 5v5 for weeks now.
88 broke out a bit against the Blues but man I really think it was more individual effort/talent on 88's part than anything the line did.
We need to invest time in our own. Hoglander is over 100GP as a 2nd rounder in the same draft, Kaliyev 50GP and Leason at 35GP.
No issue in giving him a spin.
Agreed on all of this. Robertson hasn't been ready at all and hasn't looked like an impact player at all. Let him stew in the AHL.Those 2 players also play on considerably worse teams, and are not exactly ripping it up either.
Sure they are given an opportunity, but they are almost getting away from the players they could potentially be.
Hoglander is a tertiary piece in Vancouver and is barely producing at an acceptable rate and Kaliyev is on the 4th line and is again being cast as a player he projects to be nothing of. I am not trying to suggest that their time in the NHL is not valuable, but they are likely still making very crucial mistakes in their limited time on the ice. Without having a great opportunity to produce it could really effect how that player feels about themselves.
IMO we are not developing Nick to be a tertiary option for us. He should step into our lineup and be given a chance to do what he does best right away. Produce.
We saw it in the bubble, Nick playing on the 3rd line was largely a disaster. Sure he got a goal, but he was ineffective every other game. He wasn't ready, and he wasn't given the ice time to outproduce his flaws. It may have been a good experience for him, but in the end it was largely a failed attempt at injecting life down the lineup. We don't need more of that IMO.
Bring Nick up when we are confident he can assume the 2nd line LW position. At that time, slot Kerf down the lineup where we know he will remain effective. I am open to that possibility occurring this season, just not now. He needs to force our hand with his play on the Marlies.
Those 2 players also play on considerably worse teams, and are not exactly ripping it up either.
Sure they are given an opportunity, but they are almost getting away from the players they could potentially be.
Hoglander is a tertiary piece in Vancouver and is barely producing at an acceptable rate and Kaliyev is on the 4th line and is again being cast as a player he projects to be nothing of. I am not trying to suggest that their time in the NHL is not valuable, but they are likely still making very crucial mistakes in their limited time on the ice. Without having a great opportunity to produce it could really effect how that player feels about themselves.
IMO we are not developing Nick to be a tertiary option for us. He should step into our lineup and be given a chance to do what he does best right away. Produce.
We saw it in the bubble, Nick playing on the 3rd line was largely a disaster. Sure he got a goal, but he was ineffective every other game. He wasn't ready, and he wasn't given the ice time to outproduce his flaws. It may have been a good experience for him, but in the end it was largely a failed attempt at injecting life down the lineup. We don't need more of that IMO.
Bring Nick up when we are confident he can assume the 2nd line LW position. At that time, slot Kerf down the lineup where we know he will remain effective. I am open to that possibility occurring this season, just not now. He needs to force our hand with his play on the Marlies.
Know of any streams?Just a heads up, Marlies play at 3 today on TSN.
I just don't think there has been a seismic improvement in Nick's game to suggest he would be any more effective in that 4th line/bottom 6 role now than he was in the bubble. Nick is not a bottom 6 guy. He is a goal scorer who needs to touch the puck. He has improved his play away from the puck, but not nearly enough to play bottom 6 minutes IMO. The truth of the matter is, even the best 4th lines in hockey for the most part play neutral hockey. We don't need scoring on the 4th line, we need players who can provide energy and limit mistakes. The latter being the thing Nick would struggle the most with in a reduced role. You can take the role away from the goal scorer, but you'll never be able to take the goal scorer's mindset out of the role. If Nick is put in a role where his job is to play neutral/hard to play against minutes, he will still always lean to cheat offensively. That's how goal scorers typically work.What is wrong with putting Robertson on the 4th line though? I don't think he needs to immediately take over for Kerfoot in the top 6 if he wants to crack the NHL. Put him on a 4th line with Engvall and Spezza, he can get some special teams minutes, and he can feast against some weaker competition. If we are concerned about depth scoring, he is a solid in-house option.
I wouldn't do that right now though. I think you play out the next 20-25 games and then for the last 10 games or so, try it out. Use Simmonds, Dzingel, or Anderson on the 4th line in the meantime.
Remember all the failed attempts at breaking Kadri into the NHL as a tertiary player? Only to have him break out in the lockout shortened season as a top 6 guy? I feel like it will be the same idea with Nick
I just don't think there has been a seismic improvement in Nick's game to suggest he would be any more effective in that 4th line/bottom 6 role now than he was in the bubble. Nick is not a bottom 6 guy. He is a goal scorer who needs to touch the puck. He has improved his play away from the puck, but not nearly enough to play bottom 6 minutes IMO. The truth of the matter is, even the best 4th lines in hockey for the most part play neutral hockey. We don't need scoring on the 4th line, we need players who can provide energy and limit mistakes. The latter being the thing Nick would struggle the most with in a reduced role. You can take the role away from the goal scorer, but you'll never be able to take the goal scorer's mindset out of the role. If Nick is put in a role where his job is to play neutral/hard to play against minutes, he will still always lean to cheat offensively. That's how goal scorers typically work.
I'd rather wait until he legitimately dominates the AHL, just in the same respect Nylander and Kadri did and then give him the same opportunity they got when they broke into the league.
Sure, Kapanen/Brown/Hyman/Johnnson/Engvall...etc could all be used as examples of players that didn't necessarily dominate at he AHL before getting their chance at the NHL. But all of those players all played almost 100 AHL games before making the jump. Not to mention none of the players above had even a sliver of the amount of talent as Nick does at his current age. So bringing them up to fill a complimentary role was just part of their career trajectory.
Nick is a top 6 forward IMO. He needs to dominate as such in the American League and then, and only then would I give him the opportunity to show his shit at the next level. It did wonders for Kadri and Willy, and it will do wonders for Nick as well.
Remember all the failed attempts at breaking Kadri into the NHL as a tertiary player? Only to have him break out in the lockout shortened season as a top 6 guy? I feel like it will be the same idea with Nick
I was just about to add this.People still don't seem to realize how young Nick is.
This is his official AHL rookie season in normal non-covid times.
Kadri at 20 was in his normal AHL rookie year and had his first NHL call up midway through.
The issue with Kadri was that he was dinked around for a full two more years after and was still 0laying in the AHL at age 22.