aingefan
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2008
- 5,204
- 2,971
And they’ve got lotsa bodies to mix in and out.First game in a week? Can't be great for cohesion.
And they’ve got lotsa bodies to mix in and out.First game in a week? Can't be great for cohesion.
Yup.Stat watching is a touch disappointing.
Is it possible they are developing a fourth liner by playing him on the fourth line?Yup.
He’s had very little time above the fourth line though with offensive players, doesn’t get much PP time. Opposite to Minten who got airdropped good linemates and PP time.
Still, generates a couple good chances a game. Good speed, responsible, bit of physicality, hounds pucks pretty well. I think the production will pick up.
If Patches is out I hope he gets a look.We should really be giving Steeves some playing time.
He has regularly shown offensive ability and his skillset looks like one that should translate well to the NHL.
Wouldn't at all shock me if some team picks him up and he goes on to be a solid 3rd-4th liner.
I read they expect Patches to be out long-term. Steeves has earned a look for sure now.If Patches is out I hope he gets a look.
If we weren't weak at C there would be no discussion.I'm not really sure how he can be overrated when there is next to no hype around him beyond people thinking he can be a useful NHL player. I don't think I've seen a single comment about high-end potential/upside or projecting a massive amount of points at the pro level.
He's pretty firmly in potential-3C territory with an optimistic upside of 2C who can play both ends of the ice. Considering what we know about his work ethic, PK ability from last year, and the little bit of offensive potential he's shown in junior, this seems pretty reasonable.
I see Minten is PPG in the AHL.
Just so we can claim he's being hyped ...
For those who watch, was the line Grebenkin-Minten-Steeves?
Looked like on one of the goals that was it.
Grebenkin 6 assists in 10 games. 3 goals.
Steeves almost GPG, 9 goals 10 games.
It’s a fair one.Is it possible they are developing a fourth liner by playing him on the fourth line?
It's a serious question. Does he get PK time? Defensive zone starts? Shut down assignment.
It might make sense to develop a guy in the role he has a shot at playing in the NHL. I have no idea if this is what they are doing.
Interesting for him too, is that he’s got lots of time on the RW despite being LH.I read they expect Patches to be out long-term. Steeves has earned a look for sure now.
Steeves has never impressed me when he’s been called up, and he consistently looks awful in camps, when he supposedly trying to distinguish himself. Now he looks formidable again in the AHL, getting prime minutes, but I don’t see it translating at all. Hope I’m wrong.
Steeves has never impressed me when he’s been called up, and he consistently looks awful in camps, when he supposedly trying to distinguish himself. Now he looks formidable again in the AHL, getting prime minutes, but I don’t see it translating at all. Hope I’m wrong.
I don't disagree if your style is more of a setup/playmaker however Robertson and Steeves are not playmakers. Neither one of them have shown that they can handle the role they have been given in the NHL (to date) and asking for either of them to be elevated in the lineup is not something either of them deserve.It’s hard to establish what you are playing 8-9 minutes a night on the fourth line
Same for Robertson put him in the top six and see what he can do
Robertson has had plenty of opportunity at this point. Steeves has not. That doesn't mean Steeves will do anything with it either, but the two aren't the same for sure.It’s hard to establish what you are playing 8-9 minutes a night on the fourth line
Same for Robertson put him in the top six and see what he can do
With the way the Leafs 3rd and 4th liners are "producing" he should definitely get a call up and an opportunity
Steeves should really get a shot
Steeves should really get a shot
It seems he plays tonight. I can't disagree with your assessment, but some players have different trajectories. He's been the best Marlies so far this year offensively, and has earned another shot. It would suck if we gave up on him, and he went on to success elsewhere like so many others. At least he's given a shot this time, hopefully he's not given fourth line role, with limited linemates. We need something from the third line tonight.Here's another reason why I'm not high on Steeves. He's sucked at camp, repeatedly, and he's been given good minutes in his games too. Look at Robertson fighting every camp to make it. Look at McMann when given a shot. Then look at Steeves, absolutely useless, not even in the conversation to stick. And when he gets called up, never shows anything to merit more time, warm body, not much jam, zero desperation. Maybe this time it's different, but his camp was embarrassing to me, for a guy supposedly wanting to make the jump. He's a star on an underwhelming prospect pool AHL team, seen this before.
Agree, he's earned a shot with the injuries. Organization has to reward his production, I'm just sceptical it translates, because we've heard this hype before and he wilts everytime. Hope to be wrong.It seems he plays tonight. I can't disagree with your assessment, but some players have different trajectories. He's been the best Marlies so far this year offensively, and has earned another shot. It would suck if we gave up on him, and he went on to success elsewhere like so many others. At least he's given a shot this time, hopefully he's not given fourth line role, with limited linemates. We need something from the third line tonight.