Video Nasty
Registered User
- Mar 12, 2017
- 5,660
- 9,884
Lemieux 's comeback after 3.5 seasons away from the game in 2000-2001 is commonly talked about as the unbelievable accomplishment that it was. It was shocking when he returned and played like he didn't miss a beat at age 35 given his whole history.
Jagr was floundering along at a PPG clip, clearly disinterested until Lemieux's comeback spurred him on to his 4th consecutive scoring title. Mario was runner up to Sakic in Hart voting. That season was important ammunition for people, myself included, who felt that Mario (and of course Gretzky who had his own examples of great play in a low scoring league at an advanced age) would rip the league apart no matter what era it was.
If Mario could come back at age 35 and put up 35 goals 41 assists for 76 points in 43 games, good enough for 1.77 ppg in a season where scoring was 5.41 GPG league wide, surely he would hang at least 160+ in the same scoring environment or worse if he was age 22-25 and in his prime.
Just as interesting to me, but less talked about is two seasons later during the first half of his age 37 season. Scoring was at 5.19 GPG.
He started off with 29 points in his first 12 games. He had 20 goals and 48 assists for 68 points in his first 40 games (41 team games). He was leading the league in scoring at the time before he was taken out of his next game a few minutes because of injury.
He was 25, 15 and 16 points ahead of Forsberg, Naslund and Thornton respectively on that date, who ended up being the top 3 scorers with 106, 104 and 101 points for the season.
Something might have happened in Game 40 as well because he played only 10 minutes, can't remember if it was related. By the time he came back a few weeks later, he got to enjoy a few more games with his one weapon, Kovalev before he was traded.
Between that and the injury, he ended up with 91 points in 67 games, good for an 8th place finish in the scoring race and it was pretty the beginning of the end because he played just 10 games in the season before the lockout and then finished with 26 games and handed over the keys to the Penguins in Crosby's first season.
Just how impressive was the lesser talked about 2002-2003 campaign to you? He was two years older on a less talented (bad team) in a league with a little bit lower scoring than his comeback year and his point total compares very favorably in the first half versus his 2nd half comeback of 2000-2001.
Why is it so impossible for some people to wrap their head around the idea that an all-time great legend like Mario would be able to drop bare minimum 160 points in today's game during his young prime years if he was able to put up two separate halves of about a 140 point pace (pace is a dirty word for me, but he and Gretzky are special exceptions) at the ages of 35 and 37 in an environment of 5.19-5.41 GPG, with all his personal past baggage in tow?
Jagr was floundering along at a PPG clip, clearly disinterested until Lemieux's comeback spurred him on to his 4th consecutive scoring title. Mario was runner up to Sakic in Hart voting. That season was important ammunition for people, myself included, who felt that Mario (and of course Gretzky who had his own examples of great play in a low scoring league at an advanced age) would rip the league apart no matter what era it was.
If Mario could come back at age 35 and put up 35 goals 41 assists for 76 points in 43 games, good enough for 1.77 ppg in a season where scoring was 5.41 GPG league wide, surely he would hang at least 160+ in the same scoring environment or worse if he was age 22-25 and in his prime.
Just as interesting to me, but less talked about is two seasons later during the first half of his age 37 season. Scoring was at 5.19 GPG.
He started off with 29 points in his first 12 games. He had 20 goals and 48 assists for 68 points in his first 40 games (41 team games). He was leading the league in scoring at the time before he was taken out of his next game a few minutes because of injury.
He was 25, 15 and 16 points ahead of Forsberg, Naslund and Thornton respectively on that date, who ended up being the top 3 scorers with 106, 104 and 101 points for the season.
Something might have happened in Game 40 as well because he played only 10 minutes, can't remember if it was related. By the time he came back a few weeks later, he got to enjoy a few more games with his one weapon, Kovalev before he was traded.
Between that and the injury, he ended up with 91 points in 67 games, good for an 8th place finish in the scoring race and it was pretty the beginning of the end because he played just 10 games in the season before the lockout and then finished with 26 games and handed over the keys to the Penguins in Crosby's first season.
Just how impressive was the lesser talked about 2002-2003 campaign to you? He was two years older on a less talented (bad team) in a league with a little bit lower scoring than his comeback year and his point total compares very favorably in the first half versus his 2nd half comeback of 2000-2001.
Why is it so impossible for some people to wrap their head around the idea that an all-time great legend like Mario would be able to drop bare minimum 160 points in today's game during his young prime years if he was able to put up two separate halves of about a 140 point pace (pace is a dirty word for me, but he and Gretzky are special exceptions) at the ages of 35 and 37 in an environment of 5.19-5.41 GPG, with all his personal past baggage in tow?
Last edited: