damacles1156
Registered User
- Feb 5, 2010
- 21,668
- 1,318
So they are going to try him at LW initially. I hope he excels there and Bernstein can eat it.
So, I'm guessing:
Gaborik - Kopitar - Williams
Toffoli - Richards - Carter
King - Stoll - Brown
Clifford / Pearson - Lewis - Nolan
Lots of opportunities for Sutter to mix and match depending on how things are going.
Carter
I don't think I've ever seen someone so adept at handling a bouncing puck and picking pucks out of the air...that alone is worth the trade!
No one is questioning his talent, and we're all excited to him play, but there's a reason why his market value was so low.
Since February of last year, he's played about 64 games. In that time, he's scored 13 goals. That puts him at 16 goal pace over the course of a full season. Most of those games were with the Rangers, and against the defensively weaker Eastern Conference.
He has 1 power play goal in his last 91 games.
He had nearly the worst corsi on rating of any CBJ forward this season.
If this is the version of Gaborik that we're getting, than I doubt he'll have much positive impact. On the other hand, if coming to LA rejuvenates him, than he could be great, but the chances are slim IMO. He doesn't look to me like he cares much about hockey these days.
His Corsi this season is -3.58. The best corsi on the team is 8.77. He's only been in 20 games. Last year, he was top 3 on the team in corsi with 6.58. He has been a + player in all but 2 years of his career, and those were only -6 and -8. He's also had 3 40+ goal seasons in the NHL. I don't think you will find another player on our team who has that on his resume. Carter has done it once.
Bottom line: this deal is low risk and lots of upside. Just gotta see how it plays out. I'd still take Gaborik over Vanek/Moulson/Cammalleri. Vanek has 2 40+ goal seasons, the other two don't have any...Cammalleri did hit 39 though with the Flames.
I understand that Gaborik has been out of favor lately, but you gotta understand what he is capable of on the ice. He could very well be our most skilled forward since Palffy, as others have mentioned. Lots of potential here, boys.
Exactly. Unless he's lost a step, and I don't think he has, he's going to have an impact with his speed alone. If the desire is there, then look out. I was never in favor of Moulson at all for all of the reasons everyone else has brought up. Vanek I liked, but like DL says, if he's got eyes toward July 1st, forget it. Cammy? Never EVER an option. An ultra-one dimensional smurf who also has no speed. No thanks. Gabby is not far removed from a great season, unless you think the Kings are far removed from winning the Cup also.
His Corsi this season is -3.58. The best corsi on the team is 8.77. He's only been in 20 games. Last year, he was top 3 on the team in corsi with 6.58. He has been a + player in all but 2 years of his career, and those were only -6 and -8. He's also had 3 40+ goal seasons in the NHL. I don't think you will find another player on our team who has that on his resume. Carter has done it once.
Bottom line: this deal is low risk and lots of upside. Just gotta see how it plays out. I'd still take Gaborik over Vanek/Moulson/Cammalleri. Vanek has 2 40+ goal seasons, the other two don't have any...Cammalleri did hit 39 though with the Flames.
I understand that Gaborik has been out of favor lately, but you gotta understand what he is capable of on the ice. He could very well be our most skilled forward since Palffy, as others have mentioned. Lots of potential here, boys.
Holden's view of 12's injury history (more factual than anything) has me more excited do to having a better understanding of exactly why he missed the games that he has and also exactly how many games he missed.
I also like that DL is already working on an LTR for MG that will see him a King for a few more years. We are a contender without adding MG but we are much more so with him. Fingers crossed on his adding what he is more than capable of doing for us and we see him around for a few more seasons.
Great post and thanks to Holden for posting the injury history as well.
DL did day that the cap may be 3 million less then hoped for...did anyone else see that, yesterday? And he's now worried about getting all the deals done. That said, if Gaborik plays well, he must be signed if possible and someone else must go. Goal scorers do not grow on trees or can be cloned...maybe they can be cloned, but don't count on it.
Gaborik being interviewed now, says he's ready to play LW in the Kings' LW lock system.
Justin Williams, Dustin Brown, and Jim Fox have all said it before. Your official position is really just where you stand at the faceoff, once play starts you are all over the ice adapting to what's developing. It really shouldn't matter. It does make a difference with the small things, but overall it should be a livable sacrifice if those don't come together.
Holden's view of 12's injury history (more factual than anything) has me more excited do to having a better understanding of exactly why he missed the games that he has and also exactly how many games he missed.
I also like that DL is already working on an LTR for MG that will see him a King for a few more years. We are a contender without adding MG but we are much more so with him. Fingers crossed on his adding what he is more than capable of doing for us and we see him around for a few more seasons.
We got two MG's now, TG.
I have no idea what DL is talking about with the comments about the summer of 09. He says the Kings weren't ready for that type of player, yet a couple of days after missing out on Gaborik, with all the rumors saying it was the Kings not willing to go five years he brings in a declining Ryan Smyth for only a mill less than Gaborik was reportedly going to sign for (cap hit)
I still say the whole Gaborik/Smyth fiasco was AEG being cheap with the Kings (something that has thankfully ended). Smyth's contract was front loaded and AEG was also able to dump Preissing rather than bury him in Manchester. They saved plenty of actual money but made their hockey team significantly worse.
But saying "we weren't ready for that type of player" is not a very honest assessment of what happened.