Marek on NHL in Europe

Takuto Maruki

Ideal and the real
Dec 13, 2016
447
328
Brandon, Manitoba
People seem to once again believe that American sports leagues should fight god (in this case, time zones and time differences) in order to chase the dragon of more potential European or international fans, when it reality what we have now is probably going to be the best for at least three decades, until technology makes continental Europe flights from North America, especially the west coast, like, two hours max.

Guarantee that if the NHL tried the idea the QT of Marek's tweet suggests, this board, and the vast majority of the peanut gallery would lambast Bettman for making it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight and qc14

eojsmada

Registered User
Oct 23, 2022
1,122
1,334
Can't see the NHL owners, nor the PA being a fan of this. How many home games does each team lose out on? What I mean is that all of the staff, concessions, and building being dark creates a larger problem going forward. Two teams losing out on a home game a piece, for the regular season, seems already a bit too much.

Maybe have one division, every year, have their training camps and the all but one preseason game in Europe with the final ones being in their respective home arenas so the players and staff have a game to get ready and adjust back to North America.
 

Albatros

Registered User
Aug 19, 2017
14,050
9,373
Ostsee
and where is that suppose out door game suppose to happen especially in the middle of European football/soccer season.
European teams play outdoor games too. And no, the NHL shouldn't get involved.

1m4BAN.jpeg


sxe12a4c.jpg


hokejove%20hry.jpg


d6c3cfd6-eae0-4a37-8487-95f3640f260e
 

vorky

@vorkywh24
Jan 23, 2010
11,564
1,355
An outdoor game in Europe seems like the natural next step.
Do not do this in Prague with these guys :D They managed to took money from fans for two (or three?) Winter Games events (2022, 2024), but the games have never happened :huh:

WHG2024_VSECHNY-ZAPASY_1080x1080.jpeg
 

Felonious Python

Minor League Degenerate
Aug 20, 2004
32,362
9,724
NHL Europe doesn't make sense as an expansion to the league, or as an AHL style development league.

As pointed out, time zones are a killer here. A 7pm east coast start is 1am in Berlin. As a development league, what's the point? It's not NHL level, so it'd just be elbowing in on the existing IIHF ecosystem, and NHL teams can loan players to Europe already.


The Irish national team can't compete in IIHF events, and hasn't in more than a decade, because they don't have a suitable rink anywhere in the country. 5 million people.

Florida, the US's third most populated state, has 17 local rinks. Something like 1 rink per 1.35 million Floridians.


There's a financial issue with the high costs of hockey that has to really get cracked before the game (league revenue) can significantly grow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMCx4

LadyStanley

Registered User
Sep 22, 2004
111,807
24,225
Sin City
Can't see the NHL owners, nor the PA being a fan of this. How many home games does each team lose out on? What I mean is that all of the staff, concessions, and building being dark creates a larger problem going forward. Two teams losing out on a home game a piece, for the regular season, seems already a bit too much.

Maybe have one division, every year, have their training camps and the all but one preseason game in Europe with the final ones being in their respective home arenas so the players and staff have a game to get ready and adjust back to North America.
That allows another event to happen. Concert, etc. Some of which brings in more $$ than hockey game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMCx4

qc14

Registered User
Jul 1, 2024
501
846
That allows another event to happen. Concert, etc. Some of which brings in more $$ than hockey game.
Not every owner also owns their building. For those that do any concerts or NBA games or whatever else they put on there doesn't count as HRR so the PA wouldn't be able their 50% of it anyways. NHL is still a gate-driven league, don't understand why teams would voluntarily just give up 10% of their gate revenues for the season so that what in reality would be a couple hundred very wealthy fans can have a fun vacation in Europe.

As others have said I just don't understand chasing Europe, where there's already multiple well-established competing local products. Go back to Australia or Japan or China, or finally go to Mexico instead.

I get why guys like Marek are such big proponents though -- I too would want an all-expenses paid trip across the pond for a couple of weeks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight

LPHabsFan

Registered User
Jul 14, 2003
2,825
1,585
Montreal
Visit site
One of the things you have to look at as well is how much it would cost to make it worth it for the home team to have one of their games in Europe.

I know for the Rangers, unless something has changed, they're not allowed to have games outside of MSG otherwise they lose something like a 100+ year old tax advantage for MSG.

Some of the bigger market teams will make over a million dollars profit per game, meaning it would cost several million to buy the teams out, on top of needing to pay for all the travel expenses.

If you look at the history of the NHL games outside of NA, outside of what I see as three exceptions in the post cap world where revenues skyrocketed, all of the home teams were of smaller market, or footprint, which would require less to buy out.
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
42,376
18,947
Mulberry Street
Realistically not that many fans are going to travel to Europe just to see their team play. & I dont know if such. drastic change in schedule is worth it for the NHL, you'd have early afternoon games (less viewers) and for what?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad