There ya go, don’t even need Rossi now.2025 1st is probably not available now![]()
There ya go, don’t even need Rossi now.2025 1st is probably not available now![]()
Congrats![]()
I still think the easiest path to foresee is Rossi for the best 2026 1st round pick they can get at the draft. Then Guerin knows for sure (and he likes certainty) how much money he has to play with on July 1.
Miettinen
Depends. Those players cost money and if they think they can use the whole $15M wisely in free agency, it would be defensible to take the futures-equivalent of McCann or Newhook + the other piece.Think a 26 1st is too far out from helping this team to be the key piece. I think its a player + prospect, with either potentially being the primary piece, think something like Newhook + Hage(main piece) or McCann(main piece) + Miettinen.
Depends. Those players cost money and if they think they can use the whole $15M wisely in free agency, it would be defensible to take the futures-equivalent of McCann or Newhook + the other piece.
The order of operations is tough, admittedly, and I forget if the "tampering" period still exists or not.I don't think it would be defensible to take a 100% futures package unless they already used the money wisely in free agency. It's not really a defensible GM move to trade a 60 point 23 year old center for futures and then whiff on all the targets you wanted to get when the team is trying to win and trying to entice the best player they've ever had to stay longer.
Think he's probably past his prime now but it would sure be a trip down memory lane. That Brunette-Koivu-Miettinen line fed families.
The order of operations is tough, admittedly, and I forget if the "tampering" period still exists or not.
I don't see Marner or Ehlers, so there's space for Nelson alongside McCann. I'm not saying its what I want, but it is my expectation.Depends. Those players cost money and if they think they can use the whole $15M wisely in free agency, it would be defensible to take the futures-equivalent of McCann or Newhook + the other piece.
Alternatively, Rossi turned down 5 x $5M and Guerin's mindset is he's gone. Guerin decides to use the entire $15M. Rossi is still an RFA, but now Guerin can spend the summer sussing out a deal (or a Spurgeon deal), and doesn't buy into the idea that the value is tanked since you'd still have teams playing against each other.I think it's just not a chance you take in the position we're in
As long as Guerin keeps Rossi on the roster until he's spent the 15M, sure.Alternatively, Rossi turned down 5 x $5M and Guerin's mindset is he's gone. Guerin decides to use the entire $15M. Rossi is still an RFA, but now Guerin can spend the summer sussing out a deal (or a Spurgeon deal), and doesn't buy into the idea that the value is tanked since you'd still have teams playing against each other.
I'm not saying I want it, but Bennett + Nelson for $13M. The money talks for Bennett and Nelson wants to come "home".As long as Guerin keeps Rossi on the roster until he's spent the 15M, sure.
I'm also not really sure where you're spending 15M this summer, to be honest with you. Unless you get Marner, which we won't.
I'm not saying I want it, but Bennett + Nelson for $13M. The money talks for Bennett and Nelson wants to come "home".
I'm just saying, I'm not completely crossing it off the list that a Rossi trade is a futures trade, whether we like the entire package deal or not.
Not arguing that.Forgot about Bennett again. This is a pretty underwhelming class.
I'm not crossing a futures trade off, I just don't think you can do it until you have the replacements. I know the term fireable offense is thrown around a lot, but trading Rossi at the draft for a pick and a prospect, and then going into next season with basically this same roster minus Rossi is as close as it gets.
Nelson would be a huge mistake unless he signs for a major discount.I'm not saying I want it, but Bennett + Nelson for $13M. The money talks for Bennett and Nelson wants to come "home".
I'm just saying, I'm not completely crossing it off the list that a Rossi trade is a futures trade, whether we like the entire package deal or not.
Nelson would be a huge mistake unless he signs for a major discount.
Probably Yurov.What in the world will we talk and fight about when Rossi is gone?![]()
The only way I see Rossi traded this summer is for one of the other RFAs. Peterka, Vilardi, Knies, Geekie, McLeod, McTavish, etc.Forgot about Bennett again. This is a pretty underwhelming class.
I'm not crossing a futures trade off, I just don't think you can do it until you have the replacements. I know the term fireable offense is thrown around a lot, but trading Rossi at the draft for a pick and a prospect, and then going into next season with basically this same roster minus Rossi is as close as it gets.
The only way I see Rossi traded this summer is for one of the other RFAs. Peterka, Vilardi, Knies, Geekie, McLeod, McTavish, etc.
It’s a pivotal moment and Guerin is no longer hindered by the cap, like when Fiala was traded.Sure wish I shared your optimism
at what point can a team offer sheet rossi and what comp would we end up with?
Durzi is not at all a Guerin type player. He has nowhere near Spurgeon's defensive abilities.I agree, but that’s still a few years from being a reality. In a “win-now” mode, I think any changes to the defense (Brodin/Spurgeon) requires a NHL replacement to be brought in.
Durzi has had some good numbers in Utah/Arizona and he’s at a reasonable cap hit of $6M for another 3 seasons.
This definitely isn’t my preferred option, but it’s the one that I think makes the most sense if Guerin does decide to move either of Spurgeon or Brodin. I personally think you just keep both of them because their age and contracts fit in with the timeline of Buium and Jiricek’s development.