Mikeyg
Registered User
- Dec 26, 2011
- 8,884
- 2,579
I want some of you to take a step back and think critically about some of your comments. First, it is generally accepted that the leafs d "isnt good enough" and or "needs to be upgraded". If that is true, why the hell would we resign the exact same d core that "wasn't good enough"? Have we really gotten to the point where we are now blaming the weakness on carrick? like seriously? you cant cry about the d being mediocre one day, and then want to resign the same core the next......... news flash folks, these new swedes are most likely making the leafs next year... don't pencil them in on the marlies just yet.