GDT: Maple Leafs @ Devils - 7:00 PM - MSG

[Eggtimer]

I took off my Devils hoody because it's like 70 freaking degrees today for some reason. We were unbeaten since I got the hoody. I'll put it back on.

Say WHAT !!?? You think about what you did

 

[Emperoreddy]

League wants the streak to end.

 

[sddev]

Toronto touched that up? Bullshit.

 

[Dylan9z9]

Refs won this game for sure

 

[OmNomNom]

bill mentions rule 69 B

wish i could say "nice"

 

[Devilsgrl35]

We should have 2 goals right now

 

[Blender]

The rules clearly state incidental contact outside the crease is permitted. The officials clearly don't know the rules, which is hardly a shocker.

 

[Devs3cups]

" Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact. "

We're getting screwed tbh.

 

[Hisch13r]

First one was the right call. Second one was the wrong call.

 

[forceten]

TOR 2
NJ 2 Disallowed, 2 Posts

 

[MauDevils]

Betting lines must have been nice and juicy to justify this officiating.

 

[SJinNewJersey]

bill mentions rule 69 B

It's actually pretty cool he could bring that up right away.

 

[New Jersey]

am i missing something?

why the league loves these f***ing losers so much is beyond me

HoCkEy’S hOmE mArKeT

 

[Cheddabombs]

Someone fact check Bill, is he right? Can I rightfully be upset

 

[FinnishDevil]

Leave it up to the National Hockey League to have the most controversial rule be number 69 in the rulebook.

 

[Rhodes 81]

That 2nd goal feels worse because the first one should have been good.

 

[Sheros expletives]

bill mentions rule 69 B

Nice

 

[Devs3cups]

Someone fact check Bill, is he right? Can I rightfully be upset

He is:

"Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact."

 

[njdevils1982]

ok.....score here and it will start the tsunami

 

[Blender]

Someone fact check Bill, is he right? Can I rightfully be upset

Yes he's 100% correct. Murray skated in Tatar and they were outside the crease, therefore that is a good goal based on the rules.

 

[Azathoth]

I know this is nothing new but how do professional refs not know the rules?

 

[Saugus]

And now we're going to get a couple phantom PPs and that makes it even in the ref's mind.

 

[Cheddabombs]

He is:

"Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact."

 

[forceten]

It was posted above, he's absolutely right. Tatar also has the right to that non-crease space on the ice. Murray decided to do the Antonov AN225 wide bank.

 

[Bleedred]

I HATE Murray so much.

He will go down as one of the most irrelevant two time (in a row) cup winning goalies. Even more irrelevant than SCAM Ward.

At Barrasso was good for longer.

In 20-30 years from now he'll be a ridiculously hard trivia answer. Everyone will get it wrong and incorrectly answer MAF.