jabberoski
Registered User
- Aug 1, 2011
- 334
- 316
Yes, sometime between now and never.Is they a time table for the echl returning?
Yes, sometime between now and never.Is they a time table for the echl returning?
No. It depends on the city's progress toward finding a group willing to purchase a franchise.Is they a time table for the echl returning?
Is they a time table for the echl returning?
Any market has that risks it’s gotta take time I really doubt that Manchester was that bad that someday a another team will try to go there againI thought you would be "in the know" considering you were getting that Manchester hockey fan group together?
But seriously, you would need an owner who 1. knows it is a risk the hockey fans don't show up, 2. knows for a fact they won't make money the first few seasons, in fact will lose quite a lot, 3. is able to secure a lease with a building that is fairly well known to not necessarily care about handing away prime dates, 4. who would probably need other owners who agree with their exact plan as well, 5. is okay without being affiliated with the Bruins and the lack of marketing opportunities that come with it.
Good luck finding that person.
The positive effects of the minimized thread hijackings far outweighs the admittedly high emotional cost this thread has on HFB users.Just remember, @Barclay Donaldson, you created this monster (thread).
It was bad enough there remains no team there, just recognize that. Keep gathering that hockey fanbase together, see how much success you have.Any market has that risks it’s gotta take time I really doubt that Manchester was that bad that someday a another team will try to go there again
I agree that Manchester nh is a higher risk if Atlanta joins the nhl they might put there ahl teams someone else might tooThe positive effects of the minimized thread hijackings far outweighs the admittedly high emotional cost this thread has on HFB users.
It was bad enough there remains no team there, just recognize that. Keep gathering that hockey fanbase together, see how much success you have.
Is there risk in any market? Yes.
Is there significantly higher than average risk in Manchester, NH? Yes.
I agree that Manchester nh is a higher risk if Atlanta joins the nhl they might put there ahl teams someone else might too
St. Louis and Springfield lighting and Syracuse so why couldn’t Manchester and Atlanta work also Manchester is a good market it’s proven it can support hockey it’s not a long shot the city wants hockey to returnUh, what? In the hypothetical scenario a NHL franchise is placed in Atlanta, there is *0%* chance they place their AHL affiliation franchise in Manchester. Their prospect call up times would be insane. In terms of "Ideal AHL Affiliates For A Hypothetical Atlanta NHL Team," Manchester is barely above Flin Flon and far below half a million other markets.
I thought we already killed off your ridiculous "someone in the AHL will go to Manchester" thoughts in the first page of this thread. The only way this thread works is if you make progress. Your comment above suggests significant regression back into your typical irrational, incoherent, and incorrect ramblings.
St. Louis and Springfield lighting and Syracuse so why couldn’t Manchester and Atlanta work also Manchester is a good market it’s proven it can support hockey it’s not a long shot the city wants hockey to return
Why not bring the ECHL or fphl to Manchester,nh
Jeez, if Atlanta gets an NHL team again, they're going to want to keep their AHL/ECHL affiliates in the Peach State.Uh, what? In the hypothetical scenario a NHL franchise is placed in Atlanta, there is *0%* chance they place their AHL affiliation franchise in Manchester. Their prospect call up times would be insane. In terms of "Ideal AHL Affiliates For A Hypothetical Atlanta NHL Team," Manchester is barely above Flin Flon and far below half a million other markets.
I thought we already killed off your ridiculous "someone in the AHL will go to Manchester" thoughts in the first page of this thread. The only way this thread works is if you make progress. Your comment above suggests significant regression back into your typical irrational, incoherent, and incorrect ramblings.
When are we getting the Family Arena thread?Just remember, @Barclay Donaldson, you created this monster (thread).
It's resting peacefully in the FPHL, SPHL Expansions thread. Don't poke the bear.When are we getting the Family Arena thread?
This is what I’ve been saying this whole timeJust seeing this thread for the first time. I grew up in NH (about 35-40 minutes from Manchester), went to undergrad at SNHU, went to a good number of Monarchs games. They were hot at the start of their tenure there and had creative promotions, but by the time the AHL went westward there was already dwindling interest.
The ECHL failed there mostly because fans felt it was a slap in the face to be demoted and were mad at the Kings. If they just ceased operations even for a year and then put an ECHL franchise in there with a different name and branding, even if it was the same pro affiliation with LA, they'd probably have accepted it more. But having the Kings flip AHL and ECHL markets on them and being given lower-quality hockey with the same branding and such, massive rejection.
It seems like the hesitation to put a team back there is because organizations look at the failure of the ECHL Monarchs as an indictment on the market and not a reaction to the particular situation. I think if a different organization went in there they'd be moderately successful. It's a decent arena and a good market that doesn't have a lot of alternatives for entertainment. If they get the bad taste out of their mouth from what the Kings did and just go to enjoy hockey, it'll sell.
Maybe if Manchester's fans weren't a bunch of snobs who turned up their collective noses at a good product, they'd still have hockey. But they are, and they did just that, and so they got what they wanted: no hockey at all.This is what I’ve been saying this whole time
But they will get the AHL again! It is in their birthright!Maybe if Manchester's fans weren't a bunch of snobs who turned up their collective noses at a good product, they'd still have hockey. But they are, and they did just that, and so they got what they wanted: no hockey at all.
Being a older guy, who grew up in Syracuse when the old antics of the NAHL withMaybe if Manchester's fans weren't a bunch of snobs who turned up their collective noses at a good product, they'd still have hockey. But they are, and they did just that, and so they got what they wanted: no hockey at all.
Being a older guy, who grew up in Syracuse when the old antics of the NAHL with
Ron Ingram head coach (Syracuse Blazers-Bill Goldthorpe) and the Long Island Cougars with
John Brophy. I have seen hockey wars Syracuse Eagles(ahl), Syracuse Blazers(NAHL)
Syracuse had multiple failures in the ahl Syracuse Eagles, Syracuse Firebirds
Sometimes, it is because of poor management, too many weekday games etc.
Minor league hockey should be played Friday, Saturday, Sunday afternoon.
or evening
I believe that all of us, take things for granted. Instead, be thankful for the
team you have regardless of the win-loss record. Teams do not grow on trees.
You do not own them and many of us are not aware of the work done by
your owner to keep that team in your town. Covid did horrible things
to owners' pocketbooks
Personally, I feel sad that so many towns no longer have hockey. Frankly not one of us have
any clue how any fan feels when they have lost their team.
Perhaps showing a bit more compassion for that fan would be in order.
Listen...Then be compassionate....
Kindness matters....
There is a tiny, miniscule chance that the new commissioner might change those tides. The travel isn't out of this world... within 4 hours to Drummondville/Victo, 5 to Blainville, 5.5 to Quebec City and 6 to Gatineau/SJ. But if the market won't accept "inferior" hockey it might be moot.The Q/L was once again whole & pure, and the League has shown no signs of wishing to expand again beyond Northeastern Canada. So good luck with Manchester turning that tide ... or any other tide ...
Your right echl better than nothing I really don’t understand why they rejected the echl so hard I think it’s more of the owners who took over the team after the kings they removed ticket packages they lost sponsors I remember the boards missing ads they scoreboard had a renewal thingy just overall the owners where horrible if they get someone who cares about the team it will sellMaybe if Manchester's fans weren't a bunch of snobs who turned up their collective noses at a good product, they'd still have hockey. But they are, and they did just that, and so they got what they wanted: no hockey at all.