Savant
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2013
- 38,405
- 11,506
This is oversimplifying and putting the blinders on, but whatever floats your boat.ETH is currently in similar situation as Arteta was, 8th place finish and an FA cup win.
This is oversimplifying and putting the blinders on, but whatever floats your boat.ETH is currently in similar situation as Arteta was, 8th place finish and an FA cup win.
You’ve latched on to that Saliba and Arteta moved on. Arsenal are in a good position and there isn’t anyone who think they should’ve let Arteta go. Patience paid off. Otherwise they could’ve been like treble winners ChelseaDo I care?
They also said Saliba wasn't ready. Homerism doesn't mean they're right.
I totally think they should have let Arteta go, spending totally on whom they could have got instead.You’ve latched on to that Saliba and Arteta moved on. Arsenal are in a good position and there isn’t anyone who think they should’ve let Arteta go. Patience paid off. Otherwise they could’ve been like treble winners Chelsea
No it isn’t. Arteta had a bad go at the start of his Arsenal tenure straight up and there was a ton of talk about how he shouldn’t have the the job anymore after finishing 8th. And now Arsenal has consistently been one of the best performing teams in the league. That’s not to say ETH goes on the same trajectory, but let’s not act like it’s been some smooth sailing for Arsenal and Arteta the entire way.This is oversimplifying and putting the blinders on, but whatever floats your boat.
It doesn't matter if City were better, they purposely broke FFP laws that gave them an unfair advantage over 2nd place in the EPL all the way to semi-pro division 14 in English football. Based on all the punishment we've seen over the past 5-7 years, most have been points deducted when it comes to breaking FA laws. Man City has broken both FA and UEFA laws, meaning we should have seen a combination of point deductions around the time the charges were filed and a transfer ban/being kicked out of CL. Based on those factors, Arsenal rightfully won the EPL title last year and this year if the point deduction is within those years...which based on everything should have happened.No they weren’t. City were.
Arsenal could have done better by not being content with 0-0 in Manchester. They were in their best run of form and a chance to rip City’s head off but said “no thanks”
Also I didn’t think Arsenal were great when they had to play more than once a week
No it isn’t. Arteta had a bad go at the start of his Arsenal tenure straight up and there was a ton of talk about how he shouldn’t have the the job anymore after finishing 8th. And now Arsenal has consistently been one of the best performing teams in the league. That’s not to say ETH goes on the same trajectory, but let’s not act like it’s been some smooth sailing for Arsenal and Arteta the entire way.
Arteta wasn’t finishing with negative goal differences and wasn’t giving up the most shots in the leagueNo it isn’t. Arteta had a bad go at the start of his Arsenal tenure straight up and there was a ton of talk about how he shouldn’t have the the job anymore after finishing 8th. And now Arsenal has consistently been one of the best performing teams in the league. That’s not to say ETH goes on the same trajectory, but let’s not act like it’s been some smooth sailing for Arsenal and Arteta the entire way.
When it happens it happens. Hasn’t happened yet. Trust me when it happens I’ll be claiming LFC’s found titles too, but can’t do it yet.It doesn't matter if City were better, they purposely broke FFP laws that gave them an unfair advantage over 2nd place in the EPL all the way to semi-pro division 14 in English football. Based on all the punishment we've seen over the past 5-7 years, most have been points deducted when it comes to breaking FA laws. Man City has broken both FA and UEFA laws, meaning we should have seen a combination of point deductions around the time the charges were filed and a transfer ban/being kicked out of CL. Based on those factors, Arsenal rightfully won the EPL title last year and this year if the point deduction is within those years...which based on everything should have happened.
I don't disagree with your critique however, squad depth is still very much an issue with Arteta not really trusting the majority of the players.
As we've seen the last two seasons, Arteta is showing himself as a top-calibre manager, at least tactically even though he is very far from perfect. He does/did have some power-hungry control grabs in the past with the likes of Auba and Guendouzi, but these players were not blameless either. However, a lot of the problems initially were due to awful buys from the previous regime, especially from the Mislintat/Sanllehi era where Raul should probably be in jail. How he overspent for a lot of his best friend's agent players like Pepe was very "mob-esque" and though those might not be a felony, that type of thinking is definitely shady where he probably has some hidden felony activity elsewhere.No it isn’t. Arteta had a bad go at the start of his Arsenal tenure straight up and there was a ton of talk about how he shouldn’t have the the job anymore after finishing 8th.
He did have a time when Arsenal had a red card record that even Ramos would be proud of lol. However, a lot of that I suggest was cutting the bait and getting rid of the rubbish players that were here under Wenger's and Emery's era. We've seen under Arteta nowadays that red cards are extremely rare, we had like what? Only 2 last season?I think it's a fair point but at the same time, ten Hag's tenure so far has been a lot more turbulent.
Yes. LFC also didn't play the whole season with basically one striker.Was it though? LFC made UCL with Nat Phillips and Rhys Williams and probably had about as many different pairings
Arteta never finished with a negative goal differenceETH is currently in similar situation as Arteta was, 8th place finish and an FA cup win.
Except Arteta had two consecutive 8th place finishes a year later. Plus "I'M TIRED, ROBBIE!"ETH is currently in similar situation as Arteta was, 8th place finish and an FA cup win.
The first year Arteta took over a bottom half team.Except Arteta had two consecutive 8th place finishes a year later. Plus "I'M TIRED, ROBBIE!"
5 years and he's starting?Arteta is just getting started tho and they’re facing a super team. But go off king
And you didn’t play with any defenders worse than Nat Phillips and Rhys Williams.Yes. LFC also didn't play the whole season with basically one striker.
Just getting started in terms of competing.5 years and he's starting?
He'll get a ton of shit because he's arrogant. Rightfully so.
Oh United definitely did. Or did you not see Casemiro play as CB? Jonny Evans also basically had to play semi-injured.And you didn’t play with any defenders worse than Nat Phillips and Rhys Williams.
How many coaches have had to spend 650M net on their first job with a single Cup to show for it over 5 years?Just getting started in terms of competing.
We could just hire a new manager every week. Worked great for Chelsea.“Arteta was bad at first and has worked out, so it is sensible for us to commit to our manager who has been bad so far” is a pretty profoundly fallacious position
Liverpool should’ve let Hodgson cook
Games changed how many are competing against pep’s city?How many coaches have had to spend 650M net on their first job with a single Cup to show for it over 5 years?
I'm guessing nobody else in history.
Arteta wasn't even really bad per se.“Arteta was bad at first and has worked out, so it is sensible for us to commit to our manager who has been bad so far” is a pretty profoundly fallacious position
Liverpool should’ve let Hodgson cook
Did you see Casemiro play as CB? Tried his best to gift at least one goal per game.Arteta wasn't even really bad per se.
He took over a team that was 10th and on a 50 point pace and finished them 8th with a 61.5 point pace after he took over and won the FA cup.
Second season they were pretty awful in the first half again but played well in the second half and again finished 8th with a Europa Semi. They had a decent defensive record but couldn't score goals. Then was a 5th place season where they barely missed CL and then back to back 2nd place finishes.
ETH managed 3rd and an EFL cup his first year but the team was 6th in xPts.
Then this year United were 15th in xPts and 15th in xGA I get there were injuries, but the injuries absolutely should not have turned United into Burnley defensively.
ETHs second season is much worse than Arteta's despite a higher league position and the FA cup win.
And I'll repeat my question? Who spent that much with only a Cup to show for it?We could just hire a new manager every week. Worked great for Chelsea.
How many trophies has Hodgson won with Liverpool?
Games changed how many are competing against pep’s city?
Also, Arteta joined and then COVID happened. It was a weird situation not conducive to successArteta wasn't even really bad per se.
He took over a team that was 10th and on a 50 point pace and finished them 8th with a 61.5 point pace after he took over and won the FA cup.
Second season they were pretty awful in the first half again but played well in the second half and again finished 8th with a Europa Semi. They had a decent defensive record but couldn't score goals. Then was a 5th place season where they barely missed CL and then back to back 2nd place finishes.
ETH managed 3rd and an EFL cup his first year but the team was 6th in xPts.
Then this year United were 15th in xPts and 15th in xGA I get there were injuries, but the injuries absolutely should not have turned United into Burnley defensively.
ETHs second season is much worse than Arteta's despite a higher league position and the FA cup win.