Hockeyfan02 said:I don't think he would try to injure Vinny, just his emotions got the best of him and in a game that intense there are going to be some scrums with a lot of emotion.
ladybugblue said:You guys need to get off of this...the posters saying that there was no intent are no better than those that said Bertuzzi tripped on the stick. Get over it already.
He did it, he is suspended! Those that were saying Havlat deserved the five games are forgetting because it effects their teams chances in the semis...which it could effect the outcome. BUT as a Senators fan I know it effects the outcome (see how the Sens did without Havlat) but the players need to realize your skate blad is very dangerous and can cause a LOT of damage whether intentional or not. Fan of the team or not take your lumps and stop making excuses.
Give me a ****in' break, lady.ladybugblue said:the posters saying that there was no intent are no better than those that said Bertuzzi tripped on the stick.
pjbth said:Malkin is a kicking, cry-baby little girl.
helicecopter said:The point is the match penalty was undeserved and to suspend Malkin for an Olympics semifinal for what happened on the ice is a ridiculous decision, embarassing for the whole IIHF.
blamebettman said:Wow, I guess this is Russia's punishment for beating Canada. Not only was is a phantom call, it's a phantom suspension as well. Was anybody watching the way Koharski called the US-Russia game and then the US-Finland game. There's been a ton of pro north american bias going on.
blamebettman said:through bitter canadian loser glasses it is.
wildone26 said:Sorry but that is a ridiculous decision, what he did warranted a 5 minute penalty, not a game misconduct
helicecopter said:I can understand the referee, without analyzing the situation on the replay, could get it that way, but no reasons for the suspension after re-watching on TV..(unless staying consistent with the undeserved match penalty called live by the referee..)
Pepper said:Whether the ref made the right call or not is debatable; the Ruutu hit was an example of ref making the call without the aid of slow-mo video replays which show the hit to be clean technically.
artilector said:I said it was weak because the reason we have refs is to be able to moderate the rulebook in close, pressure-packed games. This was not a kick to injure, the resulting suspension is too harsh for what happened. Don't whine about "whatif he kicked harder or his skate was closer to Vincent's face"... it was not a kick meant to injure, it did not injure, it was a reaction in the heat of battle, so I'm never going to agree that it is the appropriate punishment, to suspend a player for Olympics' semis.
Van said:Is that clear enough?
Jacobv2 said:I just noticed your username. Nevermind.
CoachBombay said:Well bertuzzi sucker-punched Moore because of emotions
that's a really weak excuse if you ask me...
Dirty and thats it... thank god, the kick didnt connect...
artilector said:Lets see, here's whats clear: "If the ref determined it was an attempt to kick, and the job of the ref is to literally enforce the rulebook, then the ref made the right call".
Congratulations, you've just stated a completely true and completely meaningless fact. I applaud your effort, though.
Kingz4ever said:So this is the way IIHF thinks its going to deny Russia the gold? By suspending one of their best players for a BS thing like that? Now thats low. Its not going to make a difference anyway. the red machine is going to wax the finns.
Kingz4ever said:So this is the way IIHF thinks its going to deny Russia the gold? By suspending one of their best players for a BS thing like that? Now thats low. Its not going to make a difference anyway. the red machine is going to wax the finns.
Are you sure your in the right thread ? I think you should be in "crying canada".Resolute said:If it isnt going to make a difference, why are you building yourself an excuse?
Who are you trying to convince?
Resolute said:If it isnt going to make a difference, why are you building yourself an excuse?
Who are you trying to convince?
Resolute said:Hate em as much as any other generation of Russians.
You beat a listless Canadian team that didnt care at any point in the entire tournament. Obviously it makes this crop of Russians the best team ever.
Wow, how anyone can blame Lecavalier for this incident is beyond me. I guess you missed the part where Malkin took Vinny down in the first place by whacking him in the back of the head and pulling him to the ice. If you think what Vincent did in retaliation was "punching", you haven't seen too many fights.helicecopter said:But it's not like he was free to move and kicked Lecavalier near his face, the referee was keeping his upper body, the leg was his only free part to push away Vinny after he gave him the punch.. it didn't come close Vinny's face and didn't risk to injure the opponent.
Now that i think of that, could be a good tactic to send off an important player of your opponents..while his arms are blocked by the referee punch him! one of his leg would eventually move in reaction...
Resolute said:If it isnt going to make a difference, why are you building yourself an excuse?
Who are you trying to convince?
Kingz4ever said:No excuses. Its a fact that the IIHF had a strained relationship with the Russians and the punishment didn't fit the crime.