I would argue Edge Finland > Sweden, depth Sweden > Finland. These games are gonna be fun!Just for fun.. not related to topic but Finnish NHL only team
Rantanen - Barkov - Laine
Hintz - Aho - Granlund
Teräväinen - Haula - Maccelli
Kakko - Lundell - Lehkonen
(Luostarinen, Kapanen, Kiviranta, Tolvanen, Puustinen other potential names)
Lindell - Heiskanen
Määttä - Jokiharju
Ristolainen - Mikkola
Hakanpää - Välimäki
(Vaakanainen)
Saros
Luukkonen
Lankinen
(Kähkönen, Husso)
Yeah it was kind of hard to pick 3rd and 4th line lol, we have some good optionsI would argue Edge Finland > Sweden, depth Sweden > Finland. Theese games are gonna be fun!
I would probably run Barkov, Aho, Hintz and let Haula have the fourth line as it increases the depth without loosing any edge IMO.
I misspelled these, had to go back and correct it. Will not comment further on this issue as we will drift too far off topic and the posts will be removedYeah it was kind of hard to pick 3rd and 4th line lol, we have some good options
You obviously didn’t understand what I meant at all. As long as they have not withdrawn from occupied Ukrainian soil, they cannot come back in. They will never withdraw from the regions they have occupied and declared part of Russia, so…Just as simple as that, no repercussions, just hop back in huh
What does this have to do with hockey?You obviously didn’t understand what I meant at all. As long as they have not withdrawn from occupied Ukrainian soil, they cannot come back in. They will never withdraw from the regions they have occupied and declared part of Russia, so…
I think the wide consensus was that the two fake teams were not a good idea. The Europe team essentially spoiled the commercial value of the tournament. They knocked out the teams with actual fanbases, and they themselves did not have any fanbase. It would be like Arizona winning the Stanley Cup. And NA23, while being incredibly fun to watch, was extremely detrimental to Team USA, which is one of the largest markets. Players that would have been extremely valuable contributors on Team USA were siphoned off, leading to a disappointing performance by Team USA. So unquestionably, I think bringing back the fake teams would be a horrible idea.If Czechia can ice a full team of NHL players and ROC gets allowed back into the sport, add those 2, plust NAU23 and rest of Europe and u will have a great best-on-best tournament. 8 years and counting since the last 1
Not true. The list of Russia's proxy wars is endless, for example Syria where they destroyed entire cities (it's just that it's fashionable to hate the US, without actually paying any attention to what others do). Yet Russia was not excluded from anything for Syria, because there is a huge difference to actually incorporating whole chunks of a recently invaded country into yours and trying to make it cease to exist. For similar reasons Yugoslavia / Serbia was excluded from the 1992 Euros. Makes total sense to me.What does this have to do with hockey?
By this invasion logic USA team should not be in this tournament either. Mother of all invaders and arms suppliers.
Not quite best on best though if you fully exclude non-NHL players. Many top Europeans play in Europe while no top Canadians or Americans do. Still would be a fun tournament to watch with reasonably close to best on best action.If Czechia can ice a full team of NHL players and ROC gets allowed back into the sport, add those 2, plust NAU23 and rest of Europe and u will have a great best-on-best tournament. 8 years and counting since the last 1
Dude, the other leagues have their schedules. They won't stop just because the NHL wants them to stop.Silly rule
To be fair, of course the majority of top Euro players are in the NHL and not in Europe. But to put together the strongest team, Europeans teams call up a lot of Europe-based players while choosing to leave plenty of their NHL players at home. So no Euro team can put together their strongest team as they see it on the basis of NHL players alone.If the top euro players ain’t in the nhl, then they’re not the best. At least according to the NHL, who is allowing this to happen.
Fair point.The problem is that European leagues stated explicitly they won't take any break because of this tournament. And there currently are only 4 nations which can comfortably build a roster solely of NHL players.
Then, for the NHL’s purposes, they are not good enough to be in this tournament.To be fair, of course the majority of top Euro players are in the NHL and not in Europe. But to put together the strongest team, Europeans teams call up a lot of Europe-based players while choosing to leave plenty of their NHL players at home. So no Euro team can put together their strongest team as they see it on the basis of NHL players alone.
Fair point.
ignorance is blissThen, for the NHL’s purposes, they are not good enough to be in this tournament.
So the NHL knows better than the national coaches of each team what combination of players makes the strongest team that they coach. OK then.Then, for the NHL’s purposes, they are not good enough to be in this tournament.
For an NHL tournament, yes. You want an IIHF tournament, that’s not what this is. This is evidently an arduous process given how long it’s taken, the NHL has no interest servicing European veterans who failed to make one of the roughly 800 roster spots the league has available.So the NHL knows better than the national coaches of each team what combination of players makes the strongest team that they coach. OK then.