That's just, like, your opinion, man. I guarantee you GMTM didn't trade a first for Lehner a year ago planning on him being a backup
In a bubble sure Fleury> Lehner at this point, but given age and contract I'd rather have Lehner.
Pitt gets a skilled top 6 winger, though he carries some baggage. A lot of pens fans say they don't want Kane's problems, but he's still good and Pitt has to lose fleury one way or the other this season
Buffalo rolls with a 1A and 1B with fleury and lehner. IMO Buffalo has a solid team and fleury can help them make a playoff push, and at least provide insurance until lehner proves he can be a legit #1 goalie.
Salary about evens out
Pitt gets a skilled top 6 winger, though he carries some baggage. A lot of pens fans say they don't want Kane's problems, but he's still good and Pitt has to lose fleury one way or the other this season
Buffalo rolls with a 1A and 1B with fleury and lehner. IMO Buffalo has a solid team and fleury can help them make a playoff push, and at least provide insurance until lehner proves he can be a legit #1 goalie.
Salary about evens out
One of those trade offers that makes zero sense for either team.
Actually, Buffalo needs a goalie. Pittsburgh doesn't need a cancer.
Buffalo would have absolutely no interest in MAF. They have their goalie and this trade make less than zero sense for them.
We don't. Goalie is stocked.
LOL ... Lehner and Andres Nilsson is considered stocked? You have a much different definition on the word stocked. It's average at best.
Add Biggs with MAF and that would work
Buffalo does that and they lose Lehner to the expansion draft.
And that wouldn't be a big loss because he is not an answer IMO for Buffalo.
LOL ... Lehner and Andres Nilsson is considered stocked? You have a much different definition on the word stocked. It's average at best.
Most Sabre fans who saw him play last year would disagree wholeheartedly with you.