RED WINGS STOMP
Registered User
- Nov 28, 2022
- 1,187
- 1,595
I love him on the team personally too
True, they played together a bunch in GR, but I don't think you'll ever see Detroit go L-L, R-R in the top-4, even with AlJo's ability to play the right side.Ed - AlJo is not that far fetched. AlJo does like to play on his off side.
Yzerman : Derek, you got a minute?This is the GM saying you're going to play him in my opinion...
Yep, realistically, the only time it may happen is on a real bad line change...although I believe that Al-Jo has played with Ed on his off wing in GR.You will never see Detroit deploy:
Seider - ASP
Ed - AlJo
AND I THINK MOST OF YOU KNOW WHY
Yeah, same side shot in the top 4 seems unlikely.True, they played together a bunch in GR, but I don't think you'll ever see Detroit go L-L, R-R in the top-4, even with AlJo's ability to play the right side.
So far it seems I’ve yet to hear of legit good reasons for Walman being run out. He had a tough year but so did pretty much our whole defense and I think he is a lot better than the guys we have in our bottom 4 now because they are atrocious. If it was because he liked to party and celly too much then get over it. Sometimes it does feel like the brass of this organization are living in the wrong century. Our biggest issue on defense is we can’t skate in our bottom 4 and yzerman just keeps signing people like that. It’s 2024!
Yzerman : Derek, you got a minute?
Lalonde : Yeah. Take a seat.
Yzerman : You can't start Maatta on the 3rd pair tonight. You'll have to start Johansson.
Lalonde : Yeah, I don't want to go fifteen rounds, Stevie. The lineup card is mine, and that's all.
Yzerman : That lineup card is definitely yours. I'm just saying you can't start Maatta on the 3rd pair.
Lalonde : Well, I am starting him on the 3rd pair.
Yzerman : I don't think so. He plays for Utah now.
Lalonde : You *traded* Maatta?
- conversation between Yzerman and Lalonde, probably
Yes Sir, and the cost to send him to the NHL Siberia was a second that he got from the Preds. SY knows more than most the importance of the room atmosphere. I still think SY was trying to land Trouba and it was a convenient excuse, but he was going to move on from Jake and I am sure he wanted some control over where he went and where he ends up.We're all adults here. If it wasn't obviously on-ice it was either an action or attitude SY didn't like and wanted to make a point out of to the room. It's that simple, to me.
I don’t think all of those guys are moveable for an asset, and I don’t think Maatta is enough better than them to where you don’t do this.My biggest complaint is that I think Maatta is better than Chiarot, Petry, Holl and Gustafsson so it kind of worries me that we've once again identified the wrong guy as the odd man out. Walman, Ghost and Maatta have been Yzerman's only pro defenseman additions that have played like functional hockey players and all three are gone. Meanwhile, we actively hoard the worst defensemen in the league. I'm happy to have the roster spot and the third round pick though.
So ultimately, it's a good trade. Slightly troubling because of the context, but still good.
Seeing a lot of discussion of the Walman trade in here. And I just want to say: let's accept the narrative that Walman didn't fight hard enough to come back from injury and was a voice of poor influence in the locker room. A trade like this is exactly why I think moving him in an act of desperation was the wrong call anyway. We could have foregone signing Gustafsson (or adding Trouba), let Walman play to start the year, waited for someone to need his services and gotten a sizeable return. Even if I were to accept that he was a coke fiend who made a pass at Larkin's partner and was handing out copies of Mein Kampf in the locker room, we didn't need to be rid of him as fast as possible.
There's no reason that he needed to go so badly in the summer that we had to pay to get rid of our fifth best player. Our fifteenth best player was worth a third because we were patient. We should be able to handle having one guy Stevie doesn't want at his birthday party in the locker room for ten games if it means getting a good asset back instead of paying one. The way he's playing, I wouldn't be the least but surprised to see San Jose get a first round pick+ for him.
Considering just the Maatta trade in a vacuum, I'm happy with it.
My biggest complaint is that I think Maatta is better than Chiarot, Petry, Holl and Gustafsson so it kind of worries me that we've once again identified the wrong guy as the odd man out. Walman, Ghost and Maatta have been Yzerman's only pro defenseman additions that have played like functional hockey players and all three are gone. Meanwhile, we actively hoard the worst defensemen in the league. I'm happy to have the roster spot and the third round pick though.
So ultimately, it's a good trade. Slightly troubling because of the context, but still good.
I didn't hate Maatta at all. I was probably one of his biggest supporters on here. AlJo is not ready to babysit the train wreck that is Holl and Gus who are now even more guaranteed to have at least one of them in the lineup every night which makes us a worse team. I get that they can't move Holl or Petry, but they should have been moved someone else first, or better yet, just keep sitting Gus and Holl. Gus could have been waived to GR as well.
Aljo has only been just barely ok so far in his 3 games and was not outplaying Maatta. He also has played 11, 11, 15 or so in minutes so I am not even sure where the supposed trust from the coach has come as Lalonde still sat him for 6 games and played him the least of all of the 8 D.
me on my deathbed - "and wtf was yzerman thinking on that walman trade???"yes you shouldnt be able to talk about hockey moves on a hockey forum. You just have to blindly clap and follow.
I respect your schtick but we should be able to say that walman trade was bit of a head scratcher.
I think it's less that Maatta needed to be the one to go, and more that Holl and Gus are much closer to immovable. And I view it as a silver lining that the move was still made, since it speaks to confidence in the kid, even if the other spare parts are pretty lousy.I agree with this, exactly. I still don't like that the wrong guy is getting moved out.
I think it's less that Maatta needed to be the one to go, and more that Holl and Gus are much closer to immovable. And I view it as a silver lining that the move was still made, since it speaks to confidence in the kid, even if the other spare parts are pretty lousy.