LW Sean Farrell - Harvard University, NCAA (2020, 124th, MTL)

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.
    • Our 2025 light and dark themes were lost, so we are rebuilding them. Light theme is currently available, but work in progress

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
Interesting list . Some stars sprinkled in with nothing burgers .
For added context if you thought that was interesting: Elite Prospects - NCAA Stats All-time season

21-22: Brink (1.39 ppg) | age: 20
20-21: Caufield (1.68 ppg) | age: 19
19-20: Dugan (1.53 ppg) | age: 21
18-19: Fox (1.46 ppg) | age: 20
17-18: Gaudette (1.58 ppg) | age: 21
16-17: Aston-Reese (1.66 ppg) | age: 22
15-16: Kyle Connor (1.87 ppg) | age: 19

Sean's listed as 21... not sure if the age is based on the start of the year or end. Regardless,.. the younger the player is, the more impressive it becomes (seems like common sense).

Not to suggest that Farrell's going to have a similar fate as all other guys his age (ie. Dugan, Gaudette). I actually like his chances and have higher expectations given the lack of talent he has to compete with when it comes to getting meaningful TOI/PP opportunities (this doesn't account for the talent they bring in this years draft).
 
1679018546501.png
 
For added context if you thought that was interesting: Elite Prospects - NCAA Stats All-time season

21-22: Brink (1.39 ppg) | age: 20
20-21: Caufield (1.68 ppg) | age: 19
19-20: Dugan (1.53 ppg) | age: 21
18-19: Fox (1.46 ppg) | age: 20
17-18: Gaudette (1.58 ppg) | age: 21
16-17: Aston-Reese (1.66 ppg) | age: 22
15-16: Kyle Connor (1.87 ppg) | age: 19

Sean's listed as 21... not sure if the age is based on the start of the year or end. Regardless,.. the younger the player is, the more impressive it becomes (seems like common sense).

Not to suggest that Farrell's going to have a similar fate as all other guys his age (ie. Dugan, Gaudette). I actually like his chances and have higher expectations given the lack of talent he has to compete with when it comes to getting meaningful TOI/PP opportunities (this doesn't account for the talent they bring in this years draft).
You also have other 21 years old who had lower stats lines and bigger NHL impact.
 
I feel like Suzuki does that job pretty well. I'd rather a guy like Slafkovsky on their line down the road to help win puck battles and control possession.

Could be a good fit with Dach eventually though, who is showing he has some finishing ability himself.
Agree'd. Im kind of hoping that it will be something like

(1st 2023) - Suzuki - Caufield
Slaf - Dach - Farrell
Flipping Slaf and 1st if needed

In the future without taking into consideration possible other additions (Other draft picks - current prospects - Dubois?)
 
1 point in 14 games in the A. What the hell happened to Farrell?

slow start, now he's playing his best hockey of the season, snake bit as he rang one off the post last game and then scored but the goal was called off on review. Laval is struggling to create much offense but he's starting to find his way so the points should come.
 

Ad

Ad