Quite the revisionist history going on here. Tippett was almost undisputedly better than both of those aforementioned prospects on draft day, it wasn't a reach at all and he was pretty clearly the obvious choice over both. Tippett had 44 goals in 61 games as a draft eligible...He was easily the best pure winger in the top 10.
It's easy to question the Panthers today, but Tolvanen had serious questions about his skating, academic performance, and hockey IQ, while Vesalainen was seen more and more as a grind-it-out north-south winger with the same HIQ issues. Obviously that looks different today but let's not act like it was apparent since day one. I mean it wasn't even close.
Yeah I'm aware that he had pretty good season behind him and I cannot make claim of paying extremely close eye on him pre-draft. What I usually do with prospects who are highly touted is to look up to whatever footage I can find from the internet, yet highlight reels and what not normally do not really serve the purpose what comes down to evaluating prospects. I did look up on Tippett because I'm interested about the Panthers due to Barkov and I knew they were aiming to draft a winger in this draft. When you have the size, speed and the shot of Tippett, you don't necessarily need to even have a top notch HIQ to wrap up those kind of numbers in the OHL. Meanwhile you could argue that Vesalainen dominated in the U18s WJHC against his peers and was one of the top players in the tournament. Sure he too had the size advantage. However the higher the level of competition, the less relevant the physical edge becomes. You could see even back then that KV had the tools to become a top line player in the NHL apart from not having shown the type of a laser shot which Tippett had. Of course if we compare their shooting ability today I don't think the difference is that vast. Also I guess there were question marks in both of their hockey IQs. Anyway, yeah I get that you might go with a kid who has more impressive season and equally good shooting arsenal as Tolvanen. Yet when comparing Tippett and Vesalainen at the time, with the latter having an absolutely dominant performance in the U18 WJHC against other top players in the world, their decision to me seemed pretty odd.
I've said it dozens of times by now that it's extremely difficult to score in a professional level (especially in FEL/SEL) at age of 17 and that the scouts have still not completely adapted to this when evaluating European prospects. That's why you have the likes of Kotkaniemi with mediocre pro level performance rocketing in the draft rankings after successful WJHC. Why this didn't happen with Vesalainen I don't really know (and of course we don't know if Kotkaniemi will even be drafted in the top 10 just yet). I thought the Panthers made a mistake at the time and I've certainly not changed my mind looking back today. Doesn't mean that Tippett could not become the best winger drafted in the 2017, nor can it be taken for granted that one or even both of the Finns are able to make an impact in the best league in the world. Although I seriously doubt that.
What? they went with Tippett a sniping winger which was perfectly reasonable at the time
I never said it wasn't reasonable, but there's much more to hockey than just having the right toolbox for being an ideal sniper. I get why they made the decision, but it could turn out another Lawson Crouse kind of a pick at the end. I hope that's not the case and I guess we'll see in the near future how they all pan out.