Better players like Barratt (very underrated NHL prospect) and other younger players like Limoges and Biro surpassed him in the lineup and on the power play.
He's an example of why I don't like when people direct attention to only stats to determine if a prospect has big potential or not.
He knows he's had some tough couple of years in the interviews by him. He's had some bad luck too, he got a viral infection two years ago and missed an entire month of development.Wow, this man has declined hard. 47 points in 39 games in 16-17, following year 27 points in 30 games, now last season he produces 22 points in 37 games. Any input?
Better players like Barratt (very underrated NHL prospect) and other younger players like Limoges and Biro surpassed him in the lineup and on the power play.
He's an example of why I don't like when people direct attention to only stats to determine if a prospect has big potential or not.
Nothing really. Just another russian guy who thought NA minors are a great place to develop.Damn... What happened?
So tell us about where he played as a youth and the choice to move to NA.Nothing really. Just another russian guy who thought NA minors are a great place to develop.
He played in the US. What of it? Just proves the point that a guy like Provorov is rather the exception than the norm.So tell us about where he played as a youth and the choice to move to NA.
He played in the US. He may not end up being an NHL player. Therefore I conclude that NA ruined him. Do I have it right?He played in the US. What of it? Just proves the point that a guy like Provorov is rather the exception than the norm.
I am getting told Provorov is an example of how NA perfectly develops Russians. Who is right then?He played in the US. He may not end up being an NHL player. Therefore I conclude that NA ruined him. Do I have it right?