LW Cole Eiserman - Boston Univ., NCAA (2024, 20th, NYI)

While I was hoping for a PPG pace in the NCAA, I can settle for 31 points(21 goals) in 34 games.

Generally a good sign when a kid just keeps scoring no matter what league they move on to. I know people like to compare to Wahlstrom but you could start seeing warning signs his first year of College
 
While I was hoping for a PPG pace in the NCAA, I can settle for 31 points(21 goals) in 34 games
Actually really good numbers for an 18 year old freshman. Also, remember Eiserman is one of the youngest in his draft class.

He’s never been a high assist guy so for him to he PPG he’s going to have to have better assist numbers. Even in the Development Program he never pulled up on his assist totals, but his goal scoring was always elite. I won’t complain if he’s a pure sniper and just concentrates on attacking and scoring the way he does now.
 
He’s never been a high assist guy so for him to he PPG he’s going to have to have better assist numbers. Even in the Development Program he never pulled up on his assist totals, but his goal scoring was always elite. I won’t complain if he’s a pure sniper and just concentrates on attacking and scoring the way he does now.

Well he did get 4 assists in 7 games(3 goals) in a limited role at the World Jrs. lol

Still annoyed me they didn't use him on first unit PP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SI90
Eiserman definitely has flaws in how he processes the game. I think he can overcome some of those things by relying on repetition rather than instincts. But his instincts for how and where to release that shot are unusual.
 
The best way to encapsulate what worries me most about Eiserman is that all his charts look like this (and this is probably the most generous one I’ve seen of him).



We can all go back and forth about if the other stuff is overblown or not, but the analytics have never liked him. Maybe you ignore it. Maybe he puts up enough goals that it doesn’t matter, but I’d be a little worried that as he rises levels and his scoring ability diminishes relative to competition (it does for virtually everyone once they reach the NHL) that he won’t put up enough goals for it to be worth it.
 
We can all go back and forth about if the other stuff is overblown or not, but the analytics have never liked him. Maybe you ignore it. Maybe he puts up enough goals that it doesn’t matter, but I’d be a little worried that as he rises levels and his scoring ability diminishes relative to competition (it does for virtually everyone once they reach the NHL) that he won’t put up enough goals for it to be worth it.
he's not a normal player. and i can see him scoring 20 goals on the power play alone.
 
We all agree his shot is NHL-level, right?

So it's a question of whether he'll be able to get the shot off. Can he get the time, space, and positioning to score well in the NHL?

My opinion is that he seems coachable. And if he's willing to learn, those are things that can to some extent be taught.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pavel Buchnevich


Eiserman is a lethal weapon

Maybe I'm being cynical but I feel like this shot gets deflected out of play 80% of the time in the NHL by even the most average NHL defenseman. The other 18.5% percent, it's going to go right into the goalie's chest.

Especially since the scouting report on Eiserman will be "will ALWAYS shoot", which is funny because a fellow NYI player (Barzal) has a scouting report that is the exact opposite "will NOT shoot".

Can he learn to bait the pass or even pass periodically to keep NHL teams from cheating? Only time will tell.
 
Maybe I'm being cynical but I feel like this shot gets deflected out of play 80% of the time in the NHL by even the most average NHL defenseman. The other 18.5% percent, it's going to go right into the goalie's chest.
There's things to be worried about with Eiserman, but this isn't one of them. If you watch him enough, you'll see that he can release from an unusually wide radius. He uses it on that play. I've even see him shoot from a relatively wide angle, and go across the net (as opposed to short side), but I don't think he could've done it in this play. tbh I think Wahlstrom can shoot the puck considerably harder than Eiserman, but Wahlstrom is nowhere near as flexible with his release, nor as accurate. And Eiserman doesn't seem to try to pick corners. But he hits the net, and generally does not shoot into the crest.

It's probably true that he scored that goal because the goalie was off line (should've been closer to the post anticipating that neither a center move nor pass across was likely + knowing who was coming at him). But I disagree about the defender blocking the shot. Eiserman consistently avoids that.
 
There's things to be worried about with Eiserman, but this isn't one of them. If you watch him enough, you'll see that he can release from an unusually wide radius. He uses it on that play.

Wahlstrom generally stood in 1 spot, Eiserman seems to move around more and find ways of being open
 
  • Like
Reactions: mm11
Wally never even sniffed anything close to what Eiserman is doing as an 18 year old. Will it translate to the NHL? No freakin clue.

My guess is Eiserman's low end potential is being a Mike Hoffman clone. Guy who has his share of warts but might crack 30 goals a couple times but generally be more in the 25-29 goal range. I would be a bit disappointed if he ends up like that but you could do worse
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kevin27nyi

Ad

Ad