monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"
LW Cole Eiserman - Boston Univ., NCAA (2024, 20th, NYI) | Page 44 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
  • Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

LW Cole Eiserman - Boston Univ., NCAA (2024, 20th, NYI)

I think it's become clear that whatever Eiserman's issues are, they aren't because he doesn't care or because he's selfish. (And for the record, I posted on this thread pushing back on that narrative this summer.) To me, that implies that any poor shot selection is due to lack of creativity or hockey IQ. And I'm not convinced this shot selection is that bad.

I think he's an NHL player in the end. He has enough physicality in his game that with good coaching and if reigned in properly could allow him to play bottom 6. Combine that with a PP1 worthy shot and you have a pretty good NHL player.
Daniel Sprong if he wasn't a massive asshole
 
Besides leading all NCAA rookies in goals with 12, Eiserman has markedly improved the rest of his game--back-checking, puck-hunting, physicality, passing--since the season began. Still, he's unlikely to be a one-and-done. I think he'll continue at Professor Pandolfo's Finishing School until ready for regular shifts in the NHL.

 
Besides leading all NCAA rookies in goals with 12, Eiserman has markedly improved the rest of his game--back-checking, puck-hunting, physicality, passing--since the season began. Still, he's unlikely to be a one-and-done. I think he'll continue at Professor Pandolfo's Finishing School until ready for regular shifts in the NHL.


Completely agree. He still has work to do both on his skating, responsibilities in the defensive zone, and routes/rotation through the neutral zone. He also needs a little more emotional maturity. (As Kev271NYI noted, he's still only 18.) I'd also like to see him in one more WJC.
 
He will go back another year for sure, and be a Hobey contender if Hagens goes and Misa/Mckenna don't come in.
 
The Wahlstrom comparison is a lazy one. Wahlstrom never had his shot or skating.
I would argue he actually had both. Those are the two areas of Wahlstrom that were always appealing. He was a moderately big winger with solid skating and if he connects on a shot it will beat a goalie.

Eiserman will likely have more success, but the idea Wahlstrom wasn’t good at those areas is a little crazy.
 
I would argue he actually had both. Those are the two areas of Wahlstrom that were always appealing. He was a moderately big winger with solid skating and if he connects on a shot it will beat a goalie.

Eiserman will likely have more success, but the idea Wahlstrom wasn’t good at those areas is a little crazy.
Wahlstrom shot ability never carried to the NCAA AHL or NHL. Eiserman has already showed his shot is legit in the NCAA. Wahlstrom had a quick release and hard wrist shot. One timer was above average shanked a lot of them because he was poorly positioned to shoot.. Eiserman one timer is way better than Wahlstroms. Eiserman also has a knack of finding space to get his shot off something Wahlstrom never had. If Eiserman doesn’t score over 30 goals in the nhl one day I would be surprised.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top
-->->