This makes no sense. Konstantinov and Chelios were both much dirtier than Kronwall and rarely if ever fought.
Chelios was Messier-style dirty, but I disagree about Konstantinov being that kind of player. He was tough as nails and knocked his opponents to the moon, but for the most part he played a normative physical game for his era.
And that’s really the difference. Those guys played in a league where there was another guy on the other side of the ice playing the same way. Konstantinov’s most famous moments came against guys like Eric Lindros and Claude Lemieux, who were hunting him just as much as he was hunting them.
Kronwall was in a league where that had already rolled back that culture. His prime was the era of CTE research and catastrophic head injuries, with the 2011 season being the turning point where the league finally put their foot down. The emphasis being,
we all knew the actual seriousness of high hits by that time.
The exceptions were egregious outliers like Cooke, Torres, Carcillo who were characterized by catching players at moments of vulnerability. Kronwall did his part by figuring out how to hit guys above the shoulders while keeping his pinky toenail in contact with the ice, to avoid penalties on technicality. It was a scummy way to play, no different than scummy crap 20 years earlier from the likes of:
He was really the last defenseman who made a habit of leaping at heads, and he deserves every bit of that reputation. I know you’re going to disagree, but I’m obviously not the only one in the room who felt he was cheap and disrespectful in the way he approached hitting.
Remember when I mentioned your hot takes on things concerning the Wings? This is a perfect example.
And just yesterday I posted about how a Wings goal is my favorite of all time. That doesn’t mean I won’t criticize a player who deserves it, regardless of which team he played for.