tailgunner
Registered User
- Jan 8, 2008
- 1,305
- 577
the one bad thing is that boston has an insane amount of games against the sabres remaining, but I think the sabres will be motivated to beat the Bruins, we shall see
Starting off with your 5 straight wins how many times have we done that? Then 8-1 after 9 games?next 4 games are against the Devils, need 4 straight wins no excuses whatsoever
then play the islanders 1 game, not impressed with the Islanders after this weekend's showing, we should win that one
then 2 straight against the flyers, a split would be acceptable
then 2 straight against the sabres, no excuses need both wins no matter what
then another 2 with the islanders, a split would be acceptable
then 2 against washington, getting 1 point out of both games would be ok
and then the final 2 games are against boston, and if boston is still holding on to the final spot with only a few
points of separation you have your destiny in your own hands, or by then we could of surpassed boston if we do
well with our games.
We'll see what happens but it looks pretty good.
I think a lot hinges on Zibs/Panarin/Kreider .....
On paper, sure... but things rarely go that way. While the Rangers SHOULD beat the Devils 4 out of 4, I highly doubt that they will. They are far too inconsistent. Ditto the rest of the schedule.
Boston has like 5 games upcoming against Buffalo. Not looking good. Rangers only will have a chance if they sweep this 4 game set from Jersey and we all know that’s not happening.
Forget about playoffs this year and start giving the kids some primo mins! That includes pp
GP | Pts | +/-0.500 | Pts% | ROW | SOW | Draft# | |
Winnipeg | 42 | 53 | 11 | 1.2619048 | 25 | 0 | 22 |
Edmonton | 42 | 52 | 10 | 1.2380952 | 25 | 0 | 21 |
Minnesota | 40 | 51 | 11 | 1.275 | 23 | 1 | 20 |
Boston | 39 | 48 | 9 | 1.2307692 | 18 | 3 | 19 |
Nashville | 43 | 47 | 4 | 1.0930233 | 18 | 5 | 18 |
Montreal | 39 | 45 | 6 | 1.1538462 | 17 | 1 | 17 |
Chicago | 43 | 45 | 2 | 1.0465116 | 18 | 2 | 16 |
Philadelphia | 41 | 44 | 3 | 1.0731707 | 18 | 1 | 15 |
New York | 41 | 44 | 3 | 1.0731707 | 18 | 1 | 14 |
St. Louis | 41 | 44 | 3 | 1.0731707 | 17 | 2 | 13 |
Arizona | 43 | 43 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 3 | 12 |
Dallas | 40 | 41 | 1 | 1.025 | 14 | 1 | 11 |
San Jose | 41 | 40 | -1 | 0.9756098 | 13 | 5 | 10 |
Columbus | 44 | 39 | -5 | 0.8863636 | 13 | 2 | 9 |
Los Angeles | 41 | 38 | -3 | 0.9268293 | 15 | 1 | 8 |
Calgary | 41 | 37 | -4 | 0.902439 | 16 | 1 | 7 |
Detroit | 44 | 36 | -8 | 0.8181818 | 14 | 1 | 6 |
Vancouver | 37 | 35 | -2 | 0.9459459 | 13 | 3 | 5 |
New Jersey | 40 | 34 | -6 | 0.85 | 14 | 0 | 4 |
Anaheim | 43 | 33 | -10 | 0.7674419 | 12 | 1 | 3 |
Ottawa | 43 | 32 | -11 | 0.744186 | 12 | 2 | 2 |
Buffalo | 41 | 26 | -15 | 0.6341463 | 7 | 3 | 1 |
True that. Vs Carolina, Foxy, Kaapo, Shesty, Lindgren and I think Chytil (but not sure) got their feet wet.I disagree - you gotta get your youngin's feet wet
sometimes getting dusted in the playoffs can be good for a young club... shows them what it takes to be successful