Confirmed with Link: Logan Stanley 2 years 1.25 million

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
So again, why is his GF% higher than other D men on the team if they all play in front of the same goalie? Helle is a constant

View attachment 973637

The disparity isn't just between xGF and GF and GA and xGA. There's also a disparity between CF% and HDCF% - meaning that he bleeds shots, but not high danger ones. In fact, his HDSAA/60 is the exact same as Pionk, and ballpark to most of the rest of the D

View attachment 973627

Who knows, maybe @DRW204 has me on his ignore list too lol... but this is just another example of someone trying to fit the data to their opinin instead of the other way around (which is the way it's supposed to be done)
These stats actually are very telling... there are three consisten pairings and one pairing plays highly sheltered minutes...

So rather than a lump comparison - compare miller and stan - as they are partners

These charts just tell us that stan sucks and pionk is a high risk D... we all knew that. But pionk gives up high danger chances in tough match ups while stan gifts them.

Then samberg jomo and demelo are comparable while miller is better than his ice time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cotton Eye Joe
These stats actually are very telling... there are three consisten pairings and one pairing plays highly sheltered minutes...

So rather than a lump comparison - compare miller and stan - as they are partners

These charts just tell us that stan sucks and pionk is a high risk D... we all knew that. But pionk gives up high danger chances in tough match ups while stan gifts them.

Then samberg jomo and demelo are comparable while miller is better than his ice time.
That all compares exactly with my eye test.
Miller is our 6D with whoever we hopefully bring in as a 5D.
 
He hasn’t made the glaring mistake and turnover recently but it feels like it’s only a moment away. And not just a minor giveaway but a colossal blunder that results in a goal against at the most inopportune time.

He made an almost unbelievable giveaway on Tuesday. 2 things saved him, Comrie and the fact that 2 other players had already made similar gaffes and also got away with them.
 
The low goals against/astronomical on-ice SV% stick out like a sore thumb. Everywhere else his shot metrics and analytics are meh to terrible but he's hardly ever out there for a goal against.

Arniel (or whoever is sending the defensive pairs over the boards) tries to keep him sheltered from elite competition...but he does get a lot of d zone starts, so it's not the easiest assignment possible.

I think Stanley has improved - a little - since the early season. He is still not good.

3rd pair is supposed to be sheltered from elite competition. If they could handle it they would be first pair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobTheSolarsystem
I have watched off and on a bit lately. I don’t hate his game but he is still a #7-#6 NHL type IMO. Organization wants him in the line up for his size and so what are we gonna do? I give him about as much attention as any other sheltered bottom pairing guy (Fluery, Heiny, Stan, Miller to a lesser extent). Only place I don’t like him is on the PK, other than that he is serviceable but a replacement level dime a dozen type. This coaching staff have earned my trust so I’ll give them a pass.

Not worth allot of my band width to worry about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jokesondee

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad