Confirmed with Link: Logan Stanley 2 years 1.25 million

[Buffdog]

I haven’t heard people complain, about Stanley much lately. Has his game improved?

I think it's been the same as it always has been... not as bad as people make it out to be, but not good enough to be a bottom pairing D man on a true cup contender

It's been a while since he's had a catastrophic gaffe, which is what most people notice and focus on rather than his mostly OK play

I'm sure that someone on my ignore list will come in with CF% or something to disagree with me though

 

[Jets]

Most of us have just made it to “depression” or “acceptance”

 

[Bob E]

He hasn’t made the glaring mistake and turnover recently but it feels like it’s only a moment away. And not just a minor giveaway but a colossal blunder that results in a goal against at the most inopportune time.

 

[jokesondee]

He hasn’t made the glaring mistake and turnover recently but it feels like it’s only a moment away. And not just a minor giveaway but a colossal blunder that results in a goal against at the most inopportune time.

He did have a couple of pretty shitty passes on attempted zone exits that led to us getting pinned in our zone for longer stretches. He's good for a handful of those every game. They havent led directly to goals against recently but its just a matter of time.

 

[BobTheSolarsystem]

He hasn’t made the glaring mistake and turnover recently but it feels like it’s only a moment away. And not just a minor giveaway but a colossal blunder that results in a goal against at the most inopportune time.

 

[Buffdog]

He did have a couple of pretty shitty passes on attempted zone exits that led to us getting pinned in our zone for longer stretches. He's good for a handful of those every game. They havent led directly to goals against recently but its just a matter of time.

Every D man has those. Scrutinize all 6 D the same and you'll likely notice

 

[jokesondee]

Every D man has those. Scrutinize all 6 D the same and you'll likely notice

I do. I find his to be more glaring and numerous.

 

[Gm0ney]

I do. I find his to be more glaring and numerous.

We can't use stats to judge Stanley...

We can't use the eye test to judge Stanley...

We just have to take the Logang's word for it that he's doing fine...

 

[BobTheSolarsystem]

I do. I find his to be more glaring and numerous.

Since the stats v eye test v are we picking on stan - ive been watching giveaways and momentum etc with our D...

The biggest difference with Stan is that when he gives away the puck - he has a really hard time recovering... our other guys rebound pretty quickly esp Samberg and Jomo obviously.
- Then you have his 'successful' zone exits... which do work but they are quite often the equivalent of suicide passes.. where the forward gains possession but guys are on him quickly because they read Stan.
- Then inevitably he will get 'lost' on 2-3 plays a game - seemingly not knowing who to cover and sometimes end up as a screen in front of Helle...

Biggest challenge is the momentum lost while Stan is out there - its not huge but we rarely are 'taking' it to the other team when the next pairing gets on the ice... not sure any stat measures that