not really sitting around thinking about them, I just thought about the rangers terrible picks when I was thinking about the rangers making the proposal. I thought, damn, they really messed up a lot of their high draft picks, haha
Proposal: Lindholm + Rakell to Rangers
- Thread starter sasha barkov
- Start date
TheBloodyNine
Pure Bred Soviet Savage
Yes you are. You brought them up apropos of nothing because you got told your shitty proposal was dog shit. I'd probably sitting around thinking about one of the most popular teams in the league as well if my team couldn't fill half a building and hasn't won a playoff round in 26 years.
Let's just look how ridiculous this went:
you: dogshit trade proposal
me: that's dogshit, never happening
You: YEAH WELL LAF SUCKS
wow, great argument for the proposal there, really winning on that front
haha, i'm a ducks fan so I was making a proposal , why are you so mad over some random person's proposal ? Very weird
I explained how it was fair, then you kept stating the same automated response, and I noticed you were a rangers fan, and my mind started to think about their terrible drafting so since this is a hockey message boards, i thought why not bring it up to discussionYes you are. You brought them up apropos of nothing because you got told your shitty proposal was dog shit. I'd probably sitting around thinking about one of the most popular teams in the league as well if my team couldn't fill half a building and hasn't won a playoff round in 26 years.
Let's just look how ridiculous this went:
you: dogshit trade proposal
me: that's dogshit, never happening
You: YEAH WELL LAF SUCKS
wow, great argument for the proposal there, really winning on that front
TheBloodyNine
Pure Bred Soviet Savage
Got it, another poverty team in the league. We'll enjoy signing Zegras in a few years when he wants to come home.
I told you it was bad because it was unrealistic and never happening and I wanted to let you know that you are not good at this. You, for some reason, decided you were going to argue for your proposal with "Kakko sucks."
hahaha, Zegras would rather be in Sunny SoCal winning cups with a team that's good because they actually know how to draft.
Speaking of Kakko, If your team didn't fumble the kakko pick they couldve had Zegras in 2019
being a marketable franchise doesnt really matter if you cant develop your top draft picks lol
TheBloodyNine
Pure Bred Soviet Savage
Yeah they look great right now. Let me just check those standings real quick.
Yup, just as I thought. Well out of a playoff spot. Again.
just wait a few years, we're rebuilding, something you should be familiar to
TheBloodyNine
Pure Bred Soviet Savage
Uh huh. Your franchise exists because the Rangers actually make money. Never forget that.
TheBloodyNine
Pure Bred Soviet Savage
Missed the playoffs the last three years, going on four.
Some rebuild. Get some money.
egelband
Registered User
- Sep 6, 2008
- 16,062
- 14,830
Yep. Can’t afford him and the defense is fine as-is. And I am very happy to keep Miller. He’s developing so quickly at such a young age, it’s amazing. He’s untouchable for me.
Tender Rip
Wears long pants
As a Penguins fan I firmly expect that the Rangers are not getting out of the 1st round
.But that aside I also know that the teams you mention are in fact not in the Rangers division. Conference, yes.
Of all the teams currently in the East making the playoffs, I’d also expect the Rangers to have the least win-now pressure.
Ah - you had a Ninja edit.
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
Yeah just what the Rangers need, 3 Dmen making $7,000,000+ More like 3 Dmen making $8,000,000+ in reality.
FoxysExpensiveNYDigs
Boo Nieves Truther
Trolling when people dont like your bad trade proposal is so mature.
Vancouver Canucks
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2015
- 14,585
- 2,587
I think they need that extra defense to secure a good spot in the playoffs.
- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,504
- 39,332
The hell is this thread
But also since it’s a ranger ducks thread
Fowler > McIlrath
But also since it’s a ranger ducks thread
Fowler > McIlrath
Vancouver Canucks
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2015
- 14,585
- 2,587
The Crypto Guy
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 28,219
- 36,713
And blow our future? No thanks. We arent even in our window yet.
Vancouver Canucks
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2015
- 14,585
- 2,587
Speaking of Rakell, he's a winger, so I think Rangers can have a significantly better depth with the two.
WhatTheDuck
9 - 20 - 8
OP as as a fellow Ducks fan, I have to say this entire thread is just a bad look for you. Rangers fans were providing honest commentary on your bad idea and you basically threw the text version of a hissy fit. I don't even know you but I'm sure you're better than this
Vancouver Canucks
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2015
- 14,585
- 2,587
Oh, dear. I hope he or she comes to a realization soon.
pld459666
Registered User
Unpopular opinion, but I'd let the Rangers D marinate.
On average, with Trouba, they are 25 years old excluding Nemeth.
I'm not of the mindset that we need to upgrade anything but the 3rd LD.
I'm not moving K. Miller to accomplish that.
I know they have been "tied" to Lindholm and even Giordano, but I'm not of the mindset its necessary.
Ultimately, I pass on this offer.
On average, with Trouba, they are 25 years old excluding Nemeth.
I'm not of the mindset that we need to upgrade anything but the 3rd LD.
I'm not moving K. Miller to accomplish that.
I know they have been "tied" to Lindholm and even Giordano, but I'm not of the mindset its necessary.
Ultimately, I pass on this offer.
