If Treliving thinks moving Liljegren in a deal improves the Leafs, he should probably make the deal. If he breaks out with another team later on, so be it. There's no guarantee that same kind of break out would have come if he stayed a Leaf.
I would throw him, the pope, mother Teresa and Gandhi in if it would facilitate a trade with MarnerI have been saying this for a while. He is on my DNT list. Smart teams will want him thrown in to help facilitate sone other deal like Marner. Big mistake.
Yeah I'm in the let the kid play camp as well. They say it takes a long time to learn how to play D and to the people who say we know what he is by now, well then there's no rush to trade him. If he doesn't improve, he probably won't decline either so you can always move him later. But what if he does become a solid top 4 Dman, I think it's possible and if it happens we'll be very happy indeed that we waited.He needs a coach who can let him play with some confidence that it’s ok to make a mistake, and not saddle him a failing 40 year old defensive partner.
He also needs to play and not be bumped out for Holl types, stifling his development.
Put him on the 3rd pairing with Benoit, let him get a rhythm and some confidence with a coach who actually knows how to put solid defensive structures and plays into place and see what he does.
You don’t throw away your only true RHD shot D that can move the puck, have a decent shot from the blue line and cost 3-4m. You see what you have.
He was leading the team when rielly was gone wth?Id rather give bigger minutes and a longer leash to Benoit tbh. Liljegren is only seven months younger. Sure Liljegren still has upside, but he just hasn’t show much at the NHL level to be particularly concerned about. Sometimes guys need changes of scenery, sometimes they just don’t work out no matter where they go. Liljegren is a decent depth piece at the moment, nothing more.
I don't see him getting much in a trade. They should keep him for now and see how he does under a new coach. Lily staying shouldn't stop the team from getting at least 2 top 4 dmen though.
Things might be different now with Berube, but with Keefe he played and trusted those who were paid the most. He failed miserably.If he's willing to sign for less than 2 million, I'd give him another year. If he wants more, he's gotta go. We can't afford it for a guy who is very likely going to be a 3rd pairing guy who gets replaced by a rental in the play-offs.
Things might be different now with Berube, but with Keefe he played and trusted those who were paid the most. He failed miserably.
Lily's biggest issue is he upper body strength, he loses the puck battles too often in his own zone.
Playing well in the top4 for a stretch of 10 games once or twice really isn't "much". Dermott did it too, and he's not a player of any note. Liljegren has upside and I'm all for patience, but the third pairing isn't a misfit island from which nobody succeeds, it's a lot of NHL minutes against NHL players. Lilly played almost 20 minutes a night this year and while that's great, it was very rare that he had the sort of good game that forces a coach to play him more or a GM to put him into the long term plans.He was leading the team when rielly was gone wth?
Dermott has never done it as much as I wish he hadPlaying well in the top4 for a stretch of 10 games once or twice really isn't "much". Dermott did it too, and he's not a player of any note. Liljegren has upside and I'm all for patience, but the third pairing isn't a misfit island from which nobody succeeds, it's a lot of NHL minutes against NHL players. Lilly played almost 20 minutes a night this year and while that's great, it was very rare that he had the sort of good game that forces a coach to play him more or a GM to put him into the long term plans.
The games are broadcast on TV, we've all seen his good games and his bad games. What you need from a player like Liljegren is consistency in having more good games and fewer bad games. Perhaps some of that is age, but there's also plenty of chance this is just who he is. His weaknesses are very exploitable, and at 25 you'd hope that top4 D have a level of polish where they're not consistently getting worked over by mid-range NHL talent.
Like Robertson, he's a good depth piece in that he's serviceable and has upside, but is not good enough nor promising enough to lose sleep over if he's traded.
Are you letting us know that you like him so that we know you're bring serious when you say he won't make it?I don't see it.
It has been a long while since Stralman was in blue-and-white (the real blue-and-white, not the imposters), but I remember him being a very dynamic defenseman. I hated the trade at the time and, when I saw he later figured it out, I essentially thought "Well, yeah, that makes sense."
I don't get that same vibe from Liljegren. He has his good nights but unfortunately there have been just too many nights, especially (and worryingly) when the tempo and intensity picks up, where he struggles. I am not convinced any longer that he's going to figure it out and live up to his potential.
That said, Liljegren was perhaps my favourite out of that era of prospects, so I really hope I'm wrong. I'm still rooting heavily for him. I hope Tre keeps him around and, worst case, he provides some bottom-pairing depth for us. You can never have enough right-hand D, right?
Are you letting us know that you like him so that we know you're bring serious when you say he won't make it?