Trading EK for scraps so we wouldn't have to take back money.
Putting our 2nd line C on waivers to save money when we are already woefully weak down the middle with Pageau injury.
Literally every single one of the moves we make are $ motivated.
Why would Arizona not take Chabot and Smith for Hossa?
Why wouldn't Detroit do a similar deal for Zetterburg and/or Franzen?
Vegas for Clarkson?
Eugene has options if he chooses to go that route.
I have been very vocal as why I didn't like this trade but really don't agree with the word "scraps" here. In value order from my perspective :
- A 1st in 2019 or 2020 is not scrap, possibly could be high if the Sharks miss the playoffs this year or next (which is very possible, particularly next year if EK walks while many of their good players get older and since the competition in the league is so high). It could easily end up as the best asset in the deal (like everyone think Sens 1st in 2019 is the best asset in the Duchene trade right now). We know teams value first round picks as a premium nowadays.
- Balcers and Norris aren't scrap, they're probably on Formenton/Chlapik level as prospects. Still very young, they could boom.
- Tierney is not scrap, he's on Pageau level. Even younger than Pageau, just turned 24 y/o. Was 4th in Sharks forward scoring last year, with very little PP time. Could get a good/decent return for him at the deadline this year or next (depending, for example, on what they decide to do with Pageau)
- A 2nd in 2019 is not scrap. If they draft well, that pick could turn into another good prospect (recent Sens 2nd rounders : Tychonick, Formenton, Dahlen, Gagne, Chlapik)
- DeMelo is not scrap because he plays in the NHL but I'd agree that he didn't have any value, so just a throw-in in the trade
And 2 more conditional picks, very hard to say if one of them will materialize right now. Not ranking their value for now.
Of course, with quality for quantity deals, there's risk that the return totally busts or booms, it really depends on how young players are developed and how picks are made.
The rest of your post, not sure what to make with it. We know Smith was waived in a desperate attempt to get rid of his salary. The comments after, as well as the letter on his jersey and his opportunity with Stone is all conjecture with "saving face" with casual fans who don't follow the team as much.
Arizona would take Chabot and Smith for Hossa without even thinking, like every other NHL team. But you know Smith makes 3.25 per season for the next 3 years, it sure seems a lot but it's not even the average NHL salary which is probably closer to 4.0 nowadays...
We know that (almost) every move is money related, but can't see Melnyk sacrificing Chabot to save a few millions (maybe 7 millions 3 years with a replacement player making in average 1.0 per year). As much as I dislike Melnyk, I don't see something like that happening.
The debate was if Melnyk would use valuable assets to acquire cap hits to meet the floor without increasing his actual payroll.
Xspirit was suggesting that Melnyk would have to sign Stone and/or Duchene to get to the cap floor. I was trying to demonstrate how he could go another season of spending far below the floor in an effort to make it to the lockout.
Xspyrit
And no, I was not necessarily suggesting that. The point of my initial post was to demonstrate that Melnyk won't have the choice, he will have to spend money to reach the cap floor.
Trade Duchene, Stone, Dzingel? Get rid of Smith and Ryan? Even trade Ceci?
Then there's absolutely no chance the team reach the cap floor, even if they get a few Hossa contracts.
I said that keeping Stone and Duchene is my hope, but don't worry I know that with Melnyk it's very far from guaranteed.
A new ownership group that invests in this team could turn things around in a hurry.
Good point, we're spending like ~55 M$ on the roster right now. The line-up could be a lot better with 20-25 more M$.