garret9
AKA#VitoCorrelationi
So, out of the buyout thread came out a discussion about Ron Hainsey, and I thought "Sweet! More controversy. This means time for a player breakdown" much like with Burmistrov before.
So here is a weird Celebrity Biography mixed with statistical analysis.
In Hainsey's first two full seasons (and last two with CBJ), he scored 34 and 32 points respectively before becoming UFA. That was the same season that saw a bit of a crazy $$$ bid on offensive D-men. ATL signed Hainsey to bring in offense and he did it. The next season Hainsey set the club record for defensemen points (which didn't last long thanks to Enstrom and Byfuglien). So what happend? He had 10 points last season?
Even Strength and PP Production
YEAR
|
ESTOI/60
|
ESP/60
|
ESG
|
ESA
|
PPTOI/60
|
PPP/60
|
PPG
|
PPA
2008| 14.97| 0.94| 2| 19| 3.45| 3.00| 4| 14
2009| 16.24| 0.88| 5| 16| 1.19| 2.51| 0| 05
2010| 15.15| 0.58| 3| 15| 0.46| 1.58| 0| 01
2011| 17.24| 0.50| 0| 09| 0.72| 1.50| 0| 01
PP time is a huge determiner of defensemen's points. D-men depend on it (few exceptions; main ones: Karlsson, Chara, Byfuglien, etc). So what does this all mean?
2008: Hainsey and Enstrom form the main PP TOI; Hainsey sets club record with 39pts
2009: Kubina pushes Hainsey to secondary PP; ES scoring remains stable; 39pts falls to 26
2010: Enstrom-Byfuglien form PP1; Oduya-Bogosian form PP2; Hainsey loses PP time and now is paired with Stuart for 3rd pair (hence loss in ESP/60); 26pts fall to 19
2011: Year of the Jets'; PP time is Enstrom, Byfuglien, Bogosian and revolving door of Stapleton, Oduya, Flood and Hainsey (in order); Hainsey's sh% at 4% (career normal) would give 2 goals and a more normal ESP/60: 0.75; first time less than 80 games (56GP) and drop of 19 to 10
It's almost a perfect example how power-play time, games played and poor sh% years can change boxcar stats... which is why you don't use them for evaluations of players.
He deservedly loss his power-play time, because, even though he's still most likely as effective offensively as before, he's been pushed down by those even more effective (well 2009 Kubina shouldn't have pushed him down but Bogosian should have, and 2010 Hainsey was slightly more effective than Bogosian but it was an off-year for Bogo and I'm sure they were hoping him to bounce back).
So, he's decent offensively, but he's no longer being used there, so he's useless right? Well Hainsey has made some obvious pushes to become better defensively, as it's been stated on here before by others. Let's see if he was effective in it.
Even Strength Advance Stats
YEAR
|
QoC
|
OZS
|
Corsi
|
GA/60
|
+-on/60
|
OnIceSv%
|
SA/60
2008| 0.292| 44.9| -6.93| 2.82| -0.59 | 912 | 29.3
2009| 0.876| 44.0| -7.94| 2.91| -0.18 | 913 | 30.4
2010| 0.243| 48.0| -4.73| 2.42| -0.10 | 919 | 27.6
2011| 0.552| 46.9| -3.36| 2.05| 0.44 | 927 | 26.2
Hainsey has consistently been used similarly with minor fluctuations, probably more to change in coaches and overall team rather than usage. In all three measurements (Corsi, GA and +/-), there is a strong and consistent trend in improvement defensively. This seems to occur as Hainsey is getting better at pushing shots to less dangerous areas, increasing the teams sv% when he's on the ice each year.
<EDIT>I've added something here a little less wishy-washy than the goals/sv% stats. In the last column is Hainsey's on-ice SA. There is consistent improvement in the last three years although 2010 was a slight easier assignment for Hainsey competition and OZS start wise. It is nice to see that 2010 -> 2012 he faced tougher matchups/OZS and continue his improvement.
So, he's getting better defensively, and is consistent offensively but not being used there, but where does he fit with his peers. Well there 221 defensemen who played 30+ NHL games (~7 per a team) and 84 defensemen who played tough defensive minutes with 30+ NHL games (~3 per a team).
Placement Relative to Other Defensemen
OutOf
|
RelQoC
|
Corsi
|
OZS
|
P/60
|
+-/60
221| 84| 129| 61| 175| 47
7/team| 3| 4| 2| 6| 2
| | | | |
84| 51| 31| 48| 64| 12
3/team| 2| 1| 2| 2| 1
I'll skip the details but to me he's a average-to-below-average tough-minute defenseman and looks to be a ~4 on most teams. He didn't face the toughest of the toughs, nor did he beat them supremely, but he was OK. I'm still a big fan of upgrading Hainsey, but given a cap hit of ~3.0-3.5 I'd extend him for a year or two.
Hainsey's also was solid with Bogosian for a defensive minutes partner for tough minutes.
2010-12 Bogosian with: (over two season span for better sample size)
Partner
|
TOI
|
CF%
|
GF%
|
+/-
Oduya |909 |0.460 |0.314 |-26
Hainsey |582 |0.496 |0.523 |+2
Stuart |381 |0.466 |0.433 |-4
CF% and GF% are like Corsi and +/- (shot and goal differentials) but used as a percentage instead of for - against.
Hainsey vs Oduya
Now I'll make this very general but from what I've seen watching them play and viewed over stats...
Johnny seemed to be the better player in his NJ days and his first year in ATL, but that stopped in 2010. Hainsey's improvement defensively has caused his results to surpass Oduya, while Johnny seems to be regressing. Special teams wise they seem to differ depending on the year. Oduya has been better on the PP more recently. Last season Oduya was better on the PK but Hainsey was better the year before that. Either way, I'm fine with Oduya gone, because currently we need an upgrade on Hainsey and Oduya is about par, and has worse chemistry with Bogosian.
So here is a weird Celebrity Biography mixed with statistical analysis.
In Hainsey's first two full seasons (and last two with CBJ), he scored 34 and 32 points respectively before becoming UFA. That was the same season that saw a bit of a crazy $$$ bid on offensive D-men. ATL signed Hainsey to bring in offense and he did it. The next season Hainsey set the club record for defensemen points (which didn't last long thanks to Enstrom and Byfuglien). So what happend? He had 10 points last season?
Even Strength and PP Production
2008| 14.97| 0.94| 2| 19| 3.45| 3.00| 4| 14
2009| 16.24| 0.88| 5| 16| 1.19| 2.51| 0| 05
2010| 15.15| 0.58| 3| 15| 0.46| 1.58| 0| 01
2011| 17.24| 0.50| 0| 09| 0.72| 1.50| 0| 01
2008: Hainsey and Enstrom form the main PP TOI; Hainsey sets club record with 39pts
2009: Kubina pushes Hainsey to secondary PP; ES scoring remains stable; 39pts falls to 26
2010: Enstrom-Byfuglien form PP1; Oduya-Bogosian form PP2; Hainsey loses PP time and now is paired with Stuart for 3rd pair (hence loss in ESP/60); 26pts fall to 19
2011: Year of the Jets'; PP time is Enstrom, Byfuglien, Bogosian and revolving door of Stapleton, Oduya, Flood and Hainsey (in order); Hainsey's sh% at 4% (career normal) would give 2 goals and a more normal ESP/60: 0.75; first time less than 80 games (56GP) and drop of 19 to 10
It's almost a perfect example how power-play time, games played and poor sh% years can change boxcar stats... which is why you don't use them for evaluations of players.
He deservedly loss his power-play time, because, even though he's still most likely as effective offensively as before, he's been pushed down by those even more effective (well 2009 Kubina shouldn't have pushed him down but Bogosian should have, and 2010 Hainsey was slightly more effective than Bogosian but it was an off-year for Bogo and I'm sure they were hoping him to bounce back).
So, he's decent offensively, but he's no longer being used there, so he's useless right? Well Hainsey has made some obvious pushes to become better defensively, as it's been stated on here before by others. Let's see if he was effective in it.
Even Strength Advance Stats
2008| 0.292| 44.9| -6.93| 2.82| -0.59 | 912 | 29.3
2009| 0.876| 44.0| -7.94| 2.91| -0.18 | 913 | 30.4
2010| 0.243| 48.0| -4.73| 2.42| -0.10 | 919 | 27.6
2011| 0.552| 46.9| -3.36| 2.05| 0.44 | 927 | 26.2
<EDIT>I've added something here a little less wishy-washy than the goals/sv% stats. In the last column is Hainsey's on-ice SA. There is consistent improvement in the last three years although 2010 was a slight easier assignment for Hainsey competition and OZS start wise. It is nice to see that 2010 -> 2012 he faced tougher matchups/OZS and continue his improvement.
So, he's getting better defensively, and is consistent offensively but not being used there, but where does he fit with his peers. Well there 221 defensemen who played 30+ NHL games (~7 per a team) and 84 defensemen who played tough defensive minutes with 30+ NHL games (~3 per a team).
Placement Relative to Other Defensemen
221| 84| 129| 61| 175| 47
7/team| 3| 4| 2| 6| 2
| | | | |
84| 51| 31| 48| 64| 12
3/team| 2| 1| 2| 2| 1
Hainsey's also was solid with Bogosian for a defensive minutes partner for tough minutes.
2010-12 Bogosian with: (over two season span for better sample size)
Oduya |909 |0.460 |0.314 |-26
Hainsey |582 |0.496 |0.523 |+2
Stuart |381 |0.466 |0.433 |-4
Hainsey vs Oduya
Now I'll make this very general but from what I've seen watching them play and viewed over stats...
Johnny seemed to be the better player in his NJ days and his first year in ATL, but that stopped in 2010. Hainsey's improvement defensively has caused his results to surpass Oduya, while Johnny seems to be regressing. Special teams wise they seem to differ depending on the year. Oduya has been better on the PP more recently. Last season Oduya was better on the PK but Hainsey was better the year before that. Either way, I'm fine with Oduya gone, because currently we need an upgrade on Hainsey and Oduya is about par, and has worse chemistry with Bogosian.
Last edited: