The relevance is Leo's participation at the Four Nations as a benchmark. Prior to the tournament, Leo was in a mental and statistical funk. Assuming all else is equal with the other 2023 draftees, using that starting point for the statistical trend-if nothing else-highlights what a restorative turning point it was for Leo to spend two weeks with elite Swedish talent and the NT's coaching staff.For sure, still decent sample and good results, seeing as it's the most recent sample of games, but I tend to be cautious about this type of thing, especially when there are 6 guys from that draft that have even played in the NHL so far and he's currently 4th in scoring from that group overall this year.....yes, slow start and the last 20 games have been great.
When I say only 6 guys, I mean regulars, there are a few others that have played like 1, 2 or a few games.
If nothing else, the experience seems to have restored Leo's confidence, though I would play devil's advocate to the Ducks' coaching staff, he was starting to play better in the 4-6 games before the 4N.
Edit: just to make a different point than @Ducks DVM I don't think this heater Leo has been on should be used to make any sweeping declarations that Leo is better than the other 23 draftees in the league right now. They're all still developing and it's anyone's guess who will end up the best. Ducks fans and the organization would be thrilled if Leo can put up superstar 1c numbers while playing great D, but we'll see how everything shakes out. I think the big takeaway is Leo is not falling behind his draft class peers. He had a rough first half of the season but it's starting to click for him and he's right up there with anyone else in the class.
Last edited: