This pick is...fine. Right around where I had him (60). Don't think there's a ton of upside there, but I think there's a player. The good: super smart thinker of the game, elite ability to park himself around the crease and position himself for scoring opportunities, very committed multi-zone winger, and a pretty impressive DY Liiga showing in terms of production. I like his shot, it's not a laser or anything, but it's solid, and more importantly than that is he doesn't just depend on juniors-style scoring opportunities to put up goals, he's finding loose pucks and getting some pretty translatable goal scoring in. Now there's definitely some bad, too: it's not a big swing or anything, his skating definitely needs work (to put it nicely lol), and he's pretty strictly a complementary, low-upside support player at best. This, in a vacuum, isn't a huge issue to me, but I respect that others might've been lower on him. To me, the biggest beef with the puck I had is that there were a number of other options I just preferred more than him. Maybe our staff was really impressed by his brain, maybe they're trying to find that swift thinking, defensively minded bottom 6 winger via the draft instead of trading a bunch of capital for one at the deadline down the road, I'm not sure. But it's ok. I think he can play with some skating improvement. To end on a positive note, the HockeyProspect team, who puts out the high quality Black Book every year, did a pre-draft Q&A session and one of the questions was which prospect do you think you have underranked, and one of the head scouts name dropped Hameenaho as the one who he thought could burn them down the road and who should've at least been in the 40s since he looks like a winger version Faska. Yes, I know, that isn't exciting, and he did, too, but he emphasized that those players still have underappreciated value on an NHL roster. Again, to me, not my favorite pick, but I can live with it.