Lemieux looking into buying back the Penguins from FSG | Page 3 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Lemieux looking into buying back the Penguins from FSG

Michael Andlauer just paid $1B for the Senators- one of the smallest markets and a team that hadn't made the playoffs in over 5 seasons with so so attendance and previous to the sale speculation was in the 700-800 million range.
And that is also factoring that he needs to contribute to building a new arena on top of that price.
 
Is cash flow even a primary concern for owners?

Sports is a different beast it seems where cash flow seems to take a backseat to other considerations:

the fact that a sports franchise hasn't decreased in value...ever?

Real estate side deals

Write offs

Michael Andlauer just paid $1B for the Senators- one of the smallest markets and a team that hadn't made the playoffs in over 5 seasons with so so attendance and previous to the sale speculation was in the 700-800 million range.
Depends, some owners are loaded and buy team for extended leisure. Some invest to make income.

Even if the point is to cash in later in valuation it's nice to make money, and a bizness that make money appreciate faster.

Andlauder very much want to move the team closer to downtown because he ultimately want to generate more revenue.

That said, your line of thinking is correct, making at gate revenue is just one of multiple consideration.
 
One thing being overlooked is that FSG also bought the Mellon Arena site across the street from PPG with the team. That is a very valuable asset by itself.

The previous ownership group seemed to be frustrated with all the red tape and political issues of developing the site, and I don’t think property management and development really interested them.

FSG has overseen the process and has started development of what I’m sure is going to be a very valuable mix of retail and housing.

FSG can sell the team while retaining this asset to keep in their portfolio or flip to someone else for even more money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jared Grayden
Out of curiosity, jokes asise: does anyone actually believe the roster of players adds value to a team- even a McDavid?
Indirectly. One player can be the difference between being the worst team in the league and not (if you have a decent team around them), so in that instance, increased ticket sales, demand for TV, etc means the value of the team will increase.
 
Indirectly. One player can be the difference between being the worst team in the league and not (if you have a decent team around them), so in that instance, increased ticket sales, demand for TV, etc means the value of the team will increase.
But you're talking about something that is fleeting.

I would think a person who is already super rich is aware that the temporary situation doesn't add anything to the value of the team when he goes to sell ot' unless he plans to sell it.

Again, I have a strong interest in sports business and I have never come across a claim that on ice performance, having a superstar etc adds anything to the value of the team
 
I could see FSG selling a small stake as that is typically how they work, but unless it’s a significant overpayment I’d be very surprised if they sold the whole thing. That is unless there has been a big miscalculation on costs/projections etc, but that in itself would be surprising.

Perhaps they need to fund the Wirtz transfer for Liverpool.
I'm pretty sure owners can't inject money for transfers, FIFA has a bunch of rules that teams have to earn transfer money themselves.
 
Out of curiosity, jokes asise: does anyone actually believe the roster of players adds value to a team- even a McDavid?

Uh...yeah.

The Oilers are valued at 2.65 BILLION.

Edmonton Oilers on the Forbes The Business of Hockey List

The Flames are worth 1.65 billion.

Same province. One has McJesus. Another doesn't. A winning team is worth more money, simple as that. And winning teams have better players. Better players equal more value.
 
Uh...yeah.

The Oilers are valued at 2.65 BILLION.

Edmonton Oilers on the Forbes The Business of Hockey List

The Flames are worth 1.65 billion.

Same province. One has McJesus. Another doesn't. A winning team is worth more money, simple as that. And winning teams have better players. Better players equal more value.
I am willing to wager a penny that a $1B difference in value is not tethered to something as temporary and fleeting as on ice performance.

In all the valuation estimates I have seen if teams, I have never seen any reference to on ice performance or the roster
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
Lemieux buying back Pitts in case they win the McKenna-Dupont-Schultz sweepstakes
Mario is already in discussion with Uncle Gary. McKenna and Dupont to send Sid off into the sunset with Mario in the box nodding slowly in an NHL wet dream.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chizzler
On ice success likely has zero impact on team value.

I have never come across any discussin about team values that suggested on ice performance was a factor in team value.
You don’t think when Tom Brady went to Tampa bay that increased the value of the franchise? Hard to imagine it didn’t have an impact
 
  • Like
Reactions: joestevens29
You don’t think when Tom Brady went to Tampa bay that increased the value of the franchise? Hard to imagine it didn’t have an impact
Nope.

I just got see a rich mutha looking at a team and saying, "I gotta have a team with Tom Brady on it, let me sweeten mu offer by another $100M"
 
The damage Dubas did to that team should probably knock at least a few million off what Fenway originally paid
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad